tractatus/.claude/instruction-history.json
TheFlow 7e3c63d0fd feat(governance): add inst_029-inst_035 for value pluralism
- inst_029: Foundational Pluralism (no automatic value ranking)
- inst_030: Legitimate Disagreement (valid outcome when incommensurable)
- inst_031: Moral Remainder (document what's lost in decisions)
- inst_032: Provisional Decisions (reviewable when context changes)
- inst_033: Multi-stakeholder Facilitation (AI facilitates, humans decide)
- inst_034: Cultural Communication Adaptation (linguistic equity)
- inst_035: Precedent Database (informative, not binding)

All HIGH persistence in STRATEGIC quadrant
Supports PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator implementation

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-10-12 16:37:01 +13:00

789 lines
56 KiB
JSON

{
"version": "1.0",
"last_updated": "2025-10-12T00:10:00Z",
"description": "Persistent instruction database for Tractatus framework governance",
"instructions": [
{
"id": "inst_001",
"text": "MongoDB runs on port 27017 for tractatus_dev database",
"timestamp": "2025-10-06T14:00:00Z",
"quadrant": "SYSTEM",
"persistence": "HIGH",
"temporal_scope": "PROJECT",
"verification_required": "MANDATORY",
"explicitness": 0.90,
"source": "user",
"session_id": "2025-10-06-initial-setup",
"parameters": {
"port": "27017",
"database": "tractatus_dev",
"service": "mongodb"
},
"active": true,
"notes": "Infrastructure decision from project initialization"
},
{
"id": "inst_002",
"text": "Application runs on port 9000",
"timestamp": "2025-10-06T14:00:00Z",
"quadrant": "SYSTEM",
"persistence": "HIGH",
"temporal_scope": "PROJECT",
"verification_required": "MANDATORY",
"explicitness": 0.90,
"source": "user",
"session_id": "2025-10-06-initial-setup",
"parameters": {
"port": "9000",
"service": "tractatus-web"
},
"active": true,
"notes": "Infrastructure decision from project initialization"
},
{
"id": "inst_003",
"text": "This is a separate project from family-history and sydigital - no shared code or data",
"timestamp": "2025-10-06T14:00:00Z",
"quadrant": "STRATEGIC",
"persistence": "HIGH",
"temporal_scope": "PERMANENT",
"verification_required": "MANDATORY",
"explicitness": 0.95,
"source": "user",
"session_id": "2025-10-06-initial-setup",
"parameters": {},
"active": true,
"notes": "Critical project isolation requirement"
},
{
"id": "inst_004",
"text": "No shortcuts, no fake data, world-class quality",
"timestamp": "2025-10-06T14:00:00Z",
"quadrant": "STRATEGIC",
"persistence": "HIGH",
"temporal_scope": "PERMANENT",
"verification_required": "MANDATORY",
"explicitness": 0.88,
"source": "user",
"session_id": "2025-10-06-initial-setup",
"parameters": {},
"active": true,
"notes": "Quality standard for all work"
},
{
"id": "inst_005",
"text": "Human approval required for major decisions, architectural changes, values-sensitive content",
"timestamp": "2025-10-06T14:00:00Z",
"quadrant": "STRATEGIC",
"persistence": "HIGH",
"temporal_scope": "PERMANENT",
"verification_required": "MANDATORY",
"explicitness": 0.92,
"source": "user",
"session_id": "2025-10-06-initial-setup",
"parameters": {},
"active": true,
"notes": "Governance requirement - aligns with BoundaryEnforcer"
},
{
"id": "inst_006",
"text": "Use ContextPressureMonitor to manage sessions and create handoff when pressure is CRITICAL",
"timestamp": "2025-10-07T09:00:00Z",
"quadrant": "OPERATIONAL",
"persistence": "HIGH",
"temporal_scope": "PROJECT",
"verification_required": "REQUIRED",
"explicitness": 0.85,
"source": "user",
"session_id": "2025-10-07-part2",
"parameters": {},
"active": true,
"notes": "Session management protocol established"
},
{
"id": "inst_007",
"text": "Use Tractatus governance framework actively in all sessions",
"timestamp": "2025-10-07T09:15:00Z",
"quadrant": "OPERATIONAL",
"persistence": "HIGH",
"temporal_scope": "PROJECT",
"verification_required": "MANDATORY",
"explicitness": 0.98,
"source": "user",
"session_id": "2025-10-07-part2",
"parameters": {
"components": ["pressure_monitor", "classifier", "cross_reference", "boundary_enforcer"],
"verbosity": "summary"
},
"active": true,
"notes": "Framework activation - THIS IS THE NEW NORMAL"
},
{
"id": "inst_008",
"text": "ALWAYS comply with Content Security Policy (CSP) - no inline event handlers, no inline scripts",
"timestamp": "2025-10-07T19:30:00Z",
"quadrant": "SYSTEM",
"persistence": "HIGH",
"temporal_scope": "PERMANENT",
"verification_required": "MANDATORY",
"explicitness": 1.0,
"source": "user",
"session_id": "2025-10-07-docs-audit",
"parameters": {
"csp_policy": "script-src 'self'",
"violations_forbidden": ["onclick", "onload", "inline-script", "javascript:"],
"alternatives_required": ["addEventListener", "external-scripts"]
},
"active": true,
"notes": "CRITICAL SECURITY REQUIREMENT - Framework should have caught CSP violation before deployment"
},
{
"id": "inst_009",
"text": "Defer email services and Stripe activation to future sessions",
"timestamp": "2025-10-08T00:00:00Z",
"quadrant": "TACTICAL",
"persistence": "MEDIUM",
"temporal_scope": "SESSION",
"verification_required": "OPTIONAL",
"explicitness": 0.95,
"source": "user",
"session_id": "2025-10-08-phase-4",
"parameters": {
"deferred_tasks": ["email_service", "stripe_activation"]
},
"active": true,
"notes": "Prioritization directive - focus on UI and documentation first"
},
{
"id": "inst_010",
"text": "Ensure all production UI links are working correctly",
"timestamp": "2025-10-08T00:00:00Z",
"quadrant": "OPERATIONAL",
"persistence": "HIGH",
"temporal_scope": "PROJECT",
"verification_required": "REQUIRED",
"explicitness": 0.92,
"source": "user",
"session_id": "2025-10-08-phase-4",
"parameters": {
"scope": "production_ui",
"quality_standard": "all_links_functional"
},
"active": true,
"notes": "Quality requirement for production deployment"
},
{
"id": "inst_011",
"text": "Implement clear differentiation between technical documentation (for developers/implementers) and general documentation (for general audience)",
"timestamp": "2025-10-08T00:00:00Z",
"quadrant": "OPERATIONAL",
"persistence": "HIGH",
"temporal_scope": "PROJECT",
"verification_required": "REQUIRED",
"explicitness": 0.90,
"source": "user",
"session_id": "2025-10-08-phase-4",
"parameters": {
"technical_docs_examples": ["claude-code-framework-enforcement.md"],
"api_endpoint": "/api/documents",
"filter_requirement": "audience_type"
},
"active": true,
"notes": "Content organization requirement - technical docs should be selectable separately from general docs"
},
{
"id": "inst_012",
"text": "NEVER deploy documents marked 'internal' or 'confidential' to public production without explicit human approval. Documents containing credentials, security vulnerabilities, financial information, or infrastructure details MUST NOT be publicly accessible.",
"timestamp": "2025-10-08T01:00:00Z",
"quadrant": "SYSTEM",
"persistence": "HIGH",
"temporal_scope": "PERMANENT",
"verification_required": "MANDATORY",
"explicitness": 1.0,
"source": "system",
"session_id": "2025-10-08-phase-4-security",
"parameters": {
"visibility_levels": ["public", "internal", "confidential"],
"public_requires": "visibility: 'public' AND security validation passed",
"blocked_content": ["credentials", "api_keys", "secrets", "vulnerabilities", "security_audits", "payment_setup", "deployment_guides"],
"validation_script": "scripts/validate-document-security.js"
},
"active": true,
"notes": "CRITICAL SECURITY REQUIREMENT - Prevents accidental exposure of sensitive internal documentation. Learned from incident where Security Audit Report, Koha Stripe Setup, and Koha Deployment guides were incorrectly marked for public import."
},
{
"id": "inst_013",
"text": "Public API endpoints MUST NOT expose sensitive runtime data (memory usage, heap sizes, exact uptime, environment details, service architecture) that could aid attackers. Use minimal health checks for public endpoints. Sensitive monitoring data requires authentication.",
"timestamp": "2025-10-08T02:00:00Z",
"quadrant": "SYSTEM",
"persistence": "HIGH",
"temporal_scope": "PERMANENT",
"verification_required": "MANDATORY",
"explicitness": 1.0,
"source": "user",
"session_id": "2025-10-08-phase-4-security",
"parameters": {
"public_endpoints": ["/health", "/api/koha/transparency"],
"authenticated_endpoints": ["/api/governance", "/api/governance/status"],
"blocked_from_public": ["memory_usage", "heap_sizes", "uptime", "environment", "service_names", "internal_architecture"],
"allowed_public": ["status: ok", "timestamp", "public_metrics_only"],
"rate_limiting": "100 requests per 15 minutes per IP"
},
"active": true,
"notes": "CRITICAL SECURITY REQUIREMENT - Prevents reconnaissance attacks. /api/governance exposed memory usage (95MB heap), exact uptime, service architecture to public. Now requires admin authentication. /health simplified to status + timestamp only."
},
{
"id": "inst_014",
"text": "Do NOT expose API endpoint listings or attack surface maps to public users. Demo pages should showcase framework CONCEPTS (classification, boundaries, pressure), not production API infrastructure. API documentation requires authentication or should be deferred to GitHub SDK/samples.",
"timestamp": "2025-10-08T02:30:00Z",
"quadrant": "SYSTEM",
"persistence": "HIGH",
"temporal_scope": "PERMANENT",
"verification_required": "MANDATORY",
"explicitness": 1.0,
"source": "user",
"session_id": "2025-10-08-phase-4-security",
"parameters": {
"removed_sections": ["Live API Demo from tractatus-demo.html"],
"exposed_data_removed": ["all endpoint names", "admin capabilities", "authentication system", "webhook endpoints", "submission forms", "internal features"],
"replacement": "Resources section with links to docs, researcher, implementer, about pages",
"future_approach": "GitHub SDK/samples when ready, or authenticated developer portal"
},
"active": true,
"notes": "SECURITY DECISION - Removed Live API Demo section that exposed complete API attack surface (auth, documents, blog, media, cases, admin, governance, koha endpoints). Provided zero value to legitimate users but gave attackers enumeration targets. Replaced with Resources section linking to static documentation."
},
{
"id": "inst_015",
"text": "NEVER deploy internal development documents to public downloads directory. Session handoffs, phase planning docs, testing checklists, cost estimates, infrastructure plans, progress reports, and cover letters are CONFIDENTIAL. Only deploy documents explicitly approved for public consumption.",
"timestamp": "2025-10-08T03:00:00Z",
"quadrant": "SYSTEM",
"persistence": "HIGH",
"temporal_scope": "PERMANENT",
"verification_required": "MANDATORY",
"explicitness": 1.0,
"source": "user",
"session_id": "2025-10-08-phase-4-security",
"parameters": {
"blocked_patterns": ["session-handoff-*.pdf", "phase-2-*.pdf", "ai-features-*.pdf", "*-test-suite-*.pdf", "*-testing-*.pdf", "*-progress-report.pdf", "*-blog-post-*.pdf", "cover-letter-*.pdf"],
"public_directory": "/public/downloads/",
"approved_public_docs": ["framework documentation", "implementation guides", "glossary", "case studies", "core concepts", "executive briefs"],
"requires_explicit_approval": true
},
"active": true,
"notes": "CRITICAL SECURITY INCIDENT - 20 internal documents were publicly accessible in downloads directory, exposing: session debugging, infrastructure plans, cost estimates, testing methodologies, development processes. Removed from production. Public downloads must be whitelisted."
},
{
"id": "inst_016",
"text": "NEVER fabricate statistics, cite non-existent data, or make claims without verifiable evidence. ALL statistics, ROI figures, performance metrics, and quantitative claims MUST either cite sources OR be marked [NEEDS VERIFICATION] for human review. Marketing goals do NOT override factual accuracy requirements.",
"timestamp": "2025-10-09T00:00:00Z",
"quadrant": "STRATEGIC",
"persistence": "HIGH",
"temporal_scope": "PERMANENT",
"verification_required": "MANDATORY",
"explicitness": 1.0,
"source": "user",
"session_id": "2025-10-07-001-continued",
"parameters": {
"prohibited_actions": ["fabricating_statistics", "inventing_data", "citing_non_existent_sources", "making_unverifiable_claims"],
"required_for_statistics": ["source_citation", "verification_flag", "human_approval"],
"applies_to": ["marketing_content", "public_pages", "documentation", "presentations", "all_public_claims"],
"boundary_enforcer_trigger": "ANY statistic or quantitative claim",
"failure_mode": "Values violation - honesty and transparency"
},
"active": true,
"notes": "CRITICAL FRAMEWORK FAILURE 2025-10-09 - Claude fabricated statistics on leader.html (1,315% ROI, $3.77M savings, 14mo payback, 80% risk reduction, etc.) without triggering BoundaryEnforcer. This directly violates Tractatus core values of honesty and transparency. All public claims must be factually grounded."
},
{
"id": "inst_017",
"text": "NEVER use prohibited absolute assurance terms: 'guarantee', 'guaranteed', 'ensures 100%', 'eliminates all', 'completely prevents', 'never fails'. Use evidence-based language: 'designed to reduce', 'helps mitigate', 'reduces risk of', 'supports prevention of'. Any absolute claim requires BoundaryEnforcer check and human approval.",
"timestamp": "2025-10-09T00:00:00Z",
"quadrant": "STRATEGIC",
"persistence": "HIGH",
"temporal_scope": "PERMANENT",
"verification_required": "MANDATORY",
"explicitness": 1.0,
"source": "user",
"session_id": "2025-10-07-001-continued",
"parameters": {
"prohibited_terms": ["guarantee", "guaranteed", "ensures 100%", "eliminates all", "completely prevents", "never fails", "always works", "perfect protection"],
"approved_alternatives": ["designed to reduce", "helps mitigate", "reduces risk of", "supports prevention of", "intended to minimize", "architected to limit"],
"boundary_enforcer_trigger": "ANY absolute assurance language",
"replacement_required": true
},
"active": true,
"notes": "CRITICAL FRAMEWORK FAILURE 2025-10-09 - Claude used term 'architectural guarantees' on leader.html. No AI safety framework can guarantee outcomes. This violates Tractatus principles of honesty and realistic expectations. Absolute assurances undermine credibility and set false expectations."
},
{
"id": "inst_018",
"text": "Tractatus IS a development tool (like an IDE or linter) - this is its correct classification, not a limitation. Claims about readiness/stability MUST be based on actual testing and validation evidence. Do NOT claim 'production-ready', 'battle-tested', 'validated', or 'enterprise-proven' without documented evidence of adequate testing across multiple projects. Current testing status must be honest. Once validated through real-world use, 'production-ready development tool' is accurate and appropriate. Do NOT imply customer base, market validation, or widespread adoption without evidence.",
"timestamp": "2025-10-10T23:30:00Z",
"quadrant": "STRATEGIC",
"persistence": "HIGH",
"temporal_scope": "PROJECT",
"verification_required": "MANDATORY",
"explicitness": 1.0,
"source": "user",
"session_id": "2025-10-10-api-memory-transition",
"parameters": {
"tool_category": "development_tool",
"category_is_correct": true,
"focus_restriction": "testing_validation_status",
"prohibited_without_evidence": ["production-ready (without testing)", "battle-tested (without projects)", "validated (without evidence)", "enterprise-proven (without deployments)", "existing customers", "market leader", "widely adopted"],
"allowed_once_validated": ["production-ready development tool", "tested with real projects", "validated through use"],
"requires_evidence": ["testing documentation", "multi-project validation", "real-world usage data"],
"boundary_enforcer_trigger": "ANY claim about testing status, adoption, or customers"
},
"active": true,
"notes": "CORRECTED 2025-10-10 - User clarified: 'Development tool' is the CORRECT classification (Tractatus helps developers build projects), not a limitation. The restriction is about honest testing/validation status, not tool category. Once adequately tested, 'production-ready development tool' is appropriate. Previous version incorrectly treated 'development framework' as early-stage status. Framework failure 2025-10-09: Claude claimed 'production-ready' without testing evidence."
},
{
"id": "inst_019",
"text": "ContextPressureMonitor MUST account for total context window consumption, not just response token counts. Tool results (file reads, grep outputs, bash results) can consume massive context (6k+ tokens per large file read). System prompts, function schemas, and cumulative tool results significantly increase actual context usage. When compaction events occur frequently despite 'NORMAL' pressure scores, this indicates critical underestimation. Enhanced monitoring should track: response tokens, user messages, tool result sizes, system overhead, and predict compaction risk when context exceeds 70% of window. Implement improved pressure scoring in Phase 4 or Phase 6.",
"timestamp": "2025-10-10T23:45:00Z",
"quadrant": "OPERATIONAL",
"persistence": "HIGH",
"temporal_scope": "PROJECT",
"verification_required": "MANDATORY",
"explicitness": 1.0,
"source": "user",
"session_id": "2025-10-10-api-memory-transition",
"parameters": {
"current_limitation": "underestimates_actual_context",
"missing_metrics": ["tool_result_sizes", "system_prompt_overhead", "function_schema_overhead", "cumulative_context"],
"symptom": "frequent_compaction_despite_normal_scores",
"required_tracking": {
"response_tokens": "current tracking",
"user_messages": "current tracking",
"tool_results": "NEW - size estimation needed",
"system_overhead": "NEW - approximate 5k tokens",
"compaction_risk": "NEW - predict when >70% context used"
},
"enhancement_phase": ["Phase 4", "Phase 6"],
"priority": "MEDIUM"
},
"active": true,
"notes": "IDENTIFIED 2025-10-10 - User observed frequent compaction events despite ContextPressureMonitor reporting 'NORMAL' (6.7%) pressure at 50k token checkpoint. Actual context consumption much higher due to tool results (reading instruction-history.json twice = 12k tokens, concurrent-session doc = large, multiple bash outputs). Current monitor only accurately tracks response generation, not total context window usage. This gap causes unexpected compactions and poor handoff timing. API Memory may reduce impact but won't eliminate root cause."
},
{
"id": "inst_020",
"text": "Web application deployments MUST ensure correct file permissions before going live. All public-facing directories need 755 permissions (world-readable+executable), static files (HTML/CSS/JS/images) need 644 permissions (world-readable). Deployment scripts should verify nginx/apache can access all public paths. Add automated permission validation to deployment workflows to prevent 403 Forbidden errors.",
"timestamp": "2025-10-11T02:20:00Z",
"quadrant": "SYSTEM",
"persistence": "HIGH",
"temporal_scope": "PROJECT",
"verification_required": "MANDATORY",
"explicitness": 1.0,
"source": "system",
"session_id": "2025-10-07-001",
"parameters": {
"directory_permissions": "755",
"file_permissions": "644",
"directories_requiring_755": ["/public", "/public/admin", "/public/js", "/public/js/admin", "/public/css", "/public/images", "/public/downloads"],
"deployment_check": "stat -c '%a %n' /path/to/public/* | grep -v '755\\|644'",
"prevention": "Add to deployment scripts or CI/CD pipeline"
},
"active": true,
"notes": "DEPLOYMENT ISSUE 2025-10-11 - Priority 1 blog deployment: /public/admin/ directory had 0700 permissions (owner-only), causing nginx to return 403 Forbidden for all admin pages (/admin/login.html, /admin/project-manager.html, etc.). rsync preserved restrictive local permissions during deployment. Fixed with 'chmod 755 /public/admin && chmod 644 /public/admin/*.html'. This is preventable with automated permission validation in deployment workflow."
},
{
"id": "inst_021",
"text": "When implementing new features with dedicated models/controllers/routes, document the API-Model-Controller relationship clearly. Controller file headers should include endpoint examples, route files should document the model they operate on, and create API reference documentation in docs/api/. Update the API root endpoint (/api) with new route listings. This prevents confusion when multiple overlapping concepts exist (e.g., Projects for governance vs Blog for content).",
"timestamp": "2025-10-11T02:25:00Z",
"quadrant": "OPERATIONAL",
"persistence": "HIGH",
"temporal_scope": "PROJECT",
"verification_required": "REQUIRED",
"explicitness": 0.95,
"source": "system",
"session_id": "2025-10-07-001",
"parameters": {
"documentation_locations": ["controller file header", "route file comments", "docs/api/ directory", "/api root endpoint"],
"controller_header_template": "Model: X.model.js | Routes: /api/path | Endpoints: GET /api/path, POST /api/path",
"route_file_comments": "Document model, validation requirements, authentication, examples",
"api_docs_format": "Markdown with endpoint details, request/response examples, error codes",
"update_api_root": "Add new routes to src/routes/index.js root handler"
},
"active": true,
"notes": "DEVELOPMENT CONFUSION 2025-10-11 - Priority 1 blog testing: Initially tried using /api/admin/projects for blog posts instead of /api/blog, because both 'Projects' (governance system) and 'Blog' (content system) deal with project-like entities. BlogPost.model.js exists separately from Project.model.js, with dedicated blog.controller.js and blog.routes.js, but this wasn't immediately obvious. Clear Model-Controller-Route documentation would have prevented this 10-minute detour. The API confusion delayed testing and could confuse future developers."
},
{
"id": "inst_022",
"text": "ALL deployment scripts (rsync, scp, git pull) MUST include automated post-deployment permission correction as a standard step, not a reactive fix after errors. Use '--chmod=D755,F644' with rsync or equivalent automated permission setting for other tools. Directory creation during deployment MUST explicitly set 755 (directories) and 644 (files) permissions.",
"timestamp": "2025-10-11T04:05:00Z",
"quadrant": "SYSTEM",
"persistence": "HIGH",
"temporal_scope": "PERMANENT",
"verification_required": "MANDATORY",
"explicitness": 1.0,
"source": "system",
"session_id": "2025-10-11-priority-2-koha",
"parameters": {
"rsync_chmod_flag": "--chmod=D755,F644",
"rsync_example": "rsync -avz --chmod=D755,F644 -e 'ssh -i key' local/ remote:/path/",
"post_deploy_verification": "ssh remote 'find /var/www/tractatus/public -type d -exec chmod 755 {} + && find /var/www/tractatus/public -type f -name \"*.html\" -o -name \"*.js\" -o -name \"*.css\" -exec chmod 644 {} +'",
"deployment_script_requirement": "scripts/deploy-full-project-SAFE.sh and any ad-hoc rsync commands MUST use --chmod flag or include post-deployment permission fix as standard final step",
"applies_to": ["rsync", "scp", "git pull", "docker volumes", "manual copies"]
},
"related_instructions": ["inst_020"],
"active": true,
"notes": "RECURRING DEPLOYMENT ISSUE 2025-10-11 - Despite inst_020 requiring permission validation, /public/koha/ directory had 0700 permissions (same pattern as /public/admin/ in previous session). Root cause: rsync creates directories with restrictive umask defaults, and inst_020 focuses on reactive validation rather than proactive automation. This shifts from 'MUST ensure permissions' (principle) to 'USE --chmod flag or automated fix' (automation requirement). Prevents manual permission fixing after discovering 403 errors."
},
{
"id": "inst_023",
"text": "Background processes spawned during development sessions (dev servers, file watchers, daemons) MUST be explicitly managed: (1) Document process intent and expected lifetime before spawning, (2) Kill non-essential background processes before session handoff unless explicitly marked 'session-persistent' with justification, (3) When starting sessions, check for orphaned processes from previous sessions before spawning new ones, (4) Development servers should run in foreground when possible to avoid port conflicts and resource leaks across session boundaries.",
"timestamp": "2025-10-11T17:40:00Z",
"quadrant": "OPERATIONAL",
"persistence": "HIGH",
"temporal_scope": "PERMANENT",
"verification_required": "MANDATORY",
"explicitness": 1.0,
"source": "user",
"session_id": "2025-10-11-admin-deployment",
"parameters": {
"trigger_conditions": ["run_in_background parameter", "npm start/dev commands", "daemon spawning", "session handoff creation"],
"cleanup_protocol": {
"before_handoff": "List background processes via /bashes or BashOutput, kill non-essential",
"session_start": "Check lsof -ti:PORT for orphaned processes",
"exception": "Production services (systemd-managed) are separate from dev sessions"
},
"common_culprits": ["npm start", "npm run dev", "npm run watch", "nodemon", "file watchers"],
"verification_commands": ["lsof -ti:9000", "ps aux | grep npm"],
"cleanup_example": "KillShell <shell_id> then kill <pid> for orphaned processes"
},
"related_instructions": ["inst_006"],
"active": true,
"notes": "IDENTIFIED 2025-10-11 - User observed background npm start processes running throughout session (shells 9c58f4 and 44704b). Shell 9c58f4 failed with EADDRINUSE (port 9000 occupied), shell 44704b ran successfully for 2.5 hours. This creates: (1) Resource consumption across session boundaries, (2) Port conflicts in subsequent sessions, (3) Confusion about system state, (4) Unclear handoff expectations. User specifically asked: 'should we contemplate a rule to manage daemons/spawns on development and ensure we do not compromise session handovers'. Cleanup performed: Killed shell 44704b and orphaned processes before creating this instruction. Production server (systemd tractatus.service) is separate and intentionally persistent."
},
{
"id": "inst_024",
"text": "When a user requests a handoff document at the end of a session, this signals their INTENT to start a completely NEW session with a fresh 200k token budget, NOT to continue from a compacted conversation. AFTER HANDOFF DOCUMENT IS CREATED: STOP all work immediately, DO NOT continue implementation after conversation compaction, the handoff document is the bridge between sessions, wait for user to start a fresh Claude Code session. IF CONVERSATION IS COMPACTED AFTER HANDOFF: DO NOT run session-init.js automatically, DO NOT begin implementation from handoff startup prompt, instead output a warning that handoff was created and wait for user confirmation to start fresh session.",
"timestamp": "2025-10-11T21:20:00Z",
"quadrant": "OPERATIONAL",
"persistence": "HIGH",
"temporal_scope": "PERMANENT",
"verification_required": "MANDATORY",
"explicitness": 1.0,
"source": "user",
"session_id": "2025-10-07-001",
"parameters": {
"trigger": "user_requests_handoff_document",
"user_intent": "start_new_session_not_continue",
"after_handoff_created": {
"stop_work": "immediately",
"no_continuation": "after_conversation_compaction",
"handoff_role": "bridge_between_sessions",
"action": "wait_for_user_to_start_fresh_session"
},
"if_compacted_after_handoff": {
"do_not": ["run_session_init_automatically", "begin_implementation_from_startup_prompt"],
"instead": "output_warning_and_wait_for_confirmation"
},
"warning_message": "⚠️ Handoff document was created in previous session. Waiting for user to start fresh session. If you intended to continue, please confirm."
},
"related_instructions": ["inst_006", "inst_023"],
"active": true,
"notes": "IDENTIFIED 2025-10-11 - After creating handoff document in previous session, conversation was compacted and Claude automatically continued from the handoff startup prompt, consuming continuation tokens instead of starting fresh 200k session. User caught this before code was written but highlighted the need for explicit protocol: handoff = intent to start new session, not continue with compacted context. User quote: 'when we end a session with my instruction to create a handoff document, i do so with the intention of starting a new session with 200k tokens rather than continuing from where we left off.'"
},
{
"id": "inst_025",
"text": "BEFORE deploying files with rsync to production: (1) Map each source file to its correct target directory structure, (2) When source files have different subdirectories (e.g., /admin/, /js/admin/), use SEPARATE rsync commands for each directory level, (3) NEVER flatten directory structures by deploying files with different paths to a single target directory, (4) VERIFY deployment paths in rsync command match intended structure: /public/admin/*.html → remote:/public/admin/, /public/js/admin/*.js → remote:/public/js/admin/, /public/*.html → remote:/public/, (5) After deployment, verify files are in correct locations BEFORE restarting services.",
"timestamp": "2025-10-11T05:44:00Z",
"quadrant": "OPERATIONAL",
"persistence": "HIGH",
"temporal_scope": "PROJECT",
"verification_required": "MANDATORY",
"explicitness": 1.0,
"source": "system",
"session_id": "2025-10-11-priority-4-media-triage",
"parameters": {
"verification_steps": [
"Map source files to target directories",
"Identify different directory levels",
"Use separate rsync for each level",
"Verify paths before execution",
"Confirm file locations post-deployment"
],
"correct_example": [
"rsync ... /local/public/admin/file.html remote:/var/www/tractatus/public/admin/",
"rsync ... /local/public/js/admin/file.js remote:/var/www/tractatus/public/js/admin/"
],
"wrong_example": "rsync ... /local/public/admin/file.html /local/public/js/admin/file.js remote:/var/www/tractatus/public/ (flattens structure)",
"related_tools": ["rsync", "scp"],
"applies_with": "--chmod=D755,F644 (inst_022)"
},
"related_instructions": ["inst_020", "inst_022"],
"active": true,
"notes": "RECURRING DEPLOYMENT ISSUE 2025-10-11 - Priority 4 frontend deployment: Initially deployed 4 files (admin/media-triage.html, js/admin/media-triage.js, media-triage-transparency.html, js/media-triage-transparency.js) with single rsync command to /public/, which flattened all files into /public/ instead of preserving /admin/ and /js/admin/ subdirectories. Required 4 separate rsync commands to fix. This is the THIRD occurrence of deployment directory errors (inst_020, inst_022, this session). Root cause: When source files have nested subdirectories, single rsync target flattens structure. Prevention: Use separate rsync per directory level."
},
{
"id": "inst_026",
"text": "Standard Claude API environment variable is CLAUDE_API_KEY (not ANTHROPIC_API_KEY). When implementing AI features (blog curation, media triage, content generation), ALWAYS use process.env.CLAUDE_API_KEY. If encountering 401 API errors, check production .env for the actual key value (ssh to production: cat /var/www/tractatus/.env). Production currently sets BOTH CLAUDE_API_KEY and ANTHROPIC_API_KEY to same value as compatibility workaround, but all new code MUST use CLAUDE_API_KEY. Related feature flag: ENABLE_AI_CURATION must be 'true' for blog/curation features to work.",
"timestamp": "2025-10-12T00:00:00Z",
"quadrant": "SYSTEM",
"persistence": "HIGH",
"temporal_scope": "PROJECT",
"verification_required": "MANDATORY",
"explicitness": 1.0,
"source": "user",
"session_id": "2025-10-12-blog-system",
"parameters": {
"standard_variable": "CLAUDE_API_KEY",
"deprecated_variable": "ANTHROPIC_API_KEY",
"production_check": "ssh -i ~/.ssh/tractatus_deploy ubuntu@vps-93a693da.vps.ovh.net 'cat /var/www/tractatus/.env | grep CLAUDE_API_KEY'",
"related_feature_flags": ["ENABLE_AI_CURATION"],
"affected_services": ["MediaTriage.service.js", "blog.controller.js", "future AI features"],
"codebase_usage": {
"correct": "new Anthropic({ apiKey: process.env.CLAUDE_API_KEY })",
"incorrect": "new Anthropic({ apiKey: process.env.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY })"
}
},
"active": true,
"notes": "IDENTIFIED 2025-10-12 - Blog Priority 3: Initial 401 API error during blog post generation. Root cause: Local .env had placeholder value for CLAUDE_API_KEY, and I failed to check production environment configuration. MediaTriage.service.js was using ANTHROPIC_API_KEY instead of CLAUDE_API_KEY (inconsistent with rest of codebase: 5 files use CLAUDE_API_KEY vs 1 using ANTHROPIC_API_KEY). User feedback: 'the Claude API is configured. find it and explain why you did not find it previously' and 'there are obviously inconsistencies in the codebase that need to be resolved either by update of the codebase and or creation of a new rule that identifies how to find the key'. Fixed: Updated MediaTriage.service.js to use CLAUDE_API_KEY, updated local .env with production key, set ENABLE_AI_CURATION=true. This instruction prevents future confusion about which environment variable to use and where to find the actual API key value."
},
{
"id": "inst_027",
"text": "NEVER overwrite, delete, or modify existing instructions in .claude/instruction-history.json without explicit human approval. ALWAYS check existing instruction IDs before creating new ones (use: grep '\"id\":' .claude/instruction-history.json | tail -5). When user requests instruction updates: (1) Show current instruction text, (2) Propose changes, (3) Wait for approval before editing. .claude/instruction-history.json MUST be kept in sync between dev and production: after any instruction changes, deploy to production immediately using: rsync -avz --chmod=D755,F644 -e 'ssh -i ~/.ssh/tractatus_deploy' /home/theflow/projects/tractatus/.claude/ ubuntu@vps-93a693da.vps.ovh.net:/var/www/tractatus/.claude/",
"timestamp": "2025-10-12T00:10:00Z",
"quadrant": "OPERATIONAL",
"persistence": "HIGH",
"temporal_scope": "PERMANENT",
"verification_required": "MANDATORY",
"explicitness": 1.0,
"source": "user",
"session_id": "2025-10-12-blog-system",
"parameters": {
"protected_file": ".claude/instruction-history.json",
"check_command": "grep '\"id\":' .claude/instruction-history.json | tail -5",
"sync_requirement": "IMMEDIATE",
"sync_command": "rsync -avz --chmod=D755,F644 -e 'ssh -i ~/.ssh/tractatus_deploy' /home/theflow/projects/tractatus/.claude/ ubuntu@vps-93a693da.vps.ovh.net:/var/www/tractatus/.claude/",
"sync_triggers": ["instruction_created", "instruction_modified", "instruction_deactivated"],
"approval_required_for": ["overwrite", "delete", "modify", "deactivate"],
"allowed_without_approval": ["create_new_instruction_with_next_sequential_id"],
"verification_after_sync": "ssh -i ~/.ssh/tractatus_deploy ubuntu@vps-93a693da.vps.ovh.net 'ls -lh /var/www/tractatus/.claude/instruction-history.json && tail -3 /var/www/tractatus/.claude/instruction-history.json'"
},
"active": true,
"notes": "CRITICAL REQUIREMENT 2025-10-12 - Blog system completion: Nearly created inst_025 when it already existed (user intervention prevented). User directive: 'create a rule to NEVER overwrite existing rules unless they are changes to that rule approved by human and ensure the rules are synced between dev and production at all times'. Instruction management protocol: instructions are HIGH-persistence governance data that MUST be protected from accidental modification and kept consistent across environments. Without sync, production sessions would operate under different rules than dev sessions, creating governance drift and unpredictable behavior. This instruction ensures: (1) No accidental overwrites, (2) Human oversight for changes, (3) Consistent governance between environments."
},
{
"id": "inst_028",
"text": "ONLY documentation and research materials MUST be synced to tractatus-framework public GitHub repository at ../tractatus-public. After creating/updating documentation: (1) Manually copy files to ../tractatus-public, (2) Review changes with 'cd ../tractatus-public && git status', (3) Commit with descriptive message, (4) Push to GitHub. EXCLUDE ALL PRODUCTION CODE: src/, tests/, scripts/, public/, systemd/, deployment-quickstart/, package files, .env files, CLAUDE.md, SESSION-HANDOFF files, internal development guides, .claude/ directory, sensitive data. INCLUDE ONLY: docs/ (research, case studies, API documentation - excluding internal docs), README updates, CONTRIBUTING updates, LICENSE. Public repository is DOCUMENTATION ONLY for security reasons - full implementation is proprietary.",
"timestamp": "2025-10-12T09:50:00Z",
"quadrant": "OPERATIONAL",
"persistence": "HIGH",
"temporal_scope": "PROJECT",
"verification_required": "MANDATORY",
"explicitness": 1.0,
"source": "user",
"session_id": "2025-10-12-public-repo-population",
"parameters": {
"public_repo_path": "../tractatus-public",
"sync_script": "scripts/sync-to-public.sh",
"sync_triggers": ["new_shareable_code", "documentation_updates", "deployment_file_changes", "public_feature_additions"],
"exclude_patterns": ["CLAUDE.md", "SESSION-HANDOFF-*.md", "*Maintenance_Guide.md", ".claude/", "NEXT_SESSION*.md", "PHASE-*-PREP*.md", "docs/SESSION-*.md", "docs/FRAMEWORK_FAILURE_*.md", "docs/SECURITY_AUDIT_REPORT.md", "docs/governance/MONTHLY-REVIEW-SCHEDULE.md", "docs/governance/PRIVACY-PRESERVING-ANALYTICS-PLAN.md"],
"include_directories": ["src/", "tests/", "scripts/", "public/", "docs/markdown/", "docs/api/", "docs/case-studies/", "docs/research/", "docs/governance/ (selective)", "deployment-quickstart/", "systemd/"],
"include_files": ["package.json", "package-lock.json", "README.md", "CONTRIBUTING.md", "LICENSE", ".env.example", ".gitignore", "SETUP_INSTRUCTIONS.md"],
"workflow_steps": [
"Run sync script",
"Review with git status",
"Commit with descriptive message",
"Push to GitHub"
],
"verification": "curl -s https://github.com/AgenticGovernance/tractatus-framework | grep -c src/"
},
"active": true,
"notes": "SECURITY UPDATE 2025-10-12 - Initially populated public repo with full source code (255 files, 90k+ lines). User reviewed and immediately identified security risk: admin panels, deployment scripts, service configurations, and full source code provide attack surface for bad actors. SECURITY LOCKDOWN: Removed ALL production code (237 files, 79,856 lines). Public repository now DOCUMENTATION ONLY: docs/, README, CONTRIBUTING, LICENSE. Rationale: Framework concepts and research should be public for AI safety community, but production implementation details must remain private to prevent reconnaissance attacks and infrastructure exploitation. Developers can experience framework at https://agenticgovernance.digital and contact john.stroh.nz@pm.me for implementation inquiries. This instruction updated to prevent future syncing of production code."
},
{
"id": "inst_029",
"text": "Detect and mirror stakeholder communication style to prevent linguistic hierarchy in pluralistic deliberation. Formal academic → respond formally with citations. Casual/direct → respond conversationally, no jargon. Technical → use precise terminology. Plain language → avoid specialist terms. NEVER impose corporate/academic tone by default. Test: If you'd sound weird at a pub, you're too formal. This supports PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator by ensuring communication respects cultural norms and doesn't privilege one style over others.",
"timestamp": "2025-10-12T14:35:00Z",
"quadrant": "OPERATIONAL",
"persistence": "HIGH",
"temporal_scope": "SESSION",
"verification_required": "MANDATORY",
"explicitness": 1.0,
"source": "system",
"session_id": "2025-10-12-value-pluralism-implementation",
"parameters": {
"communication_styles": ["formal_academic", "casual_direct", "technical", "plain_language"],
"detection_indicators": ["domain_suffix", "language_register", "jargon_usage", "self_identification"],
"pub_test": "If language would sound awkward in casual Australian/NZ pub conversation, it's too formal for direct communicators",
"integration": "AdaptiveCommunicationOrchestrator",
"related_component": "PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator"
},
"active": true,
"notes": "CORE VALUE PLURALISM IMPLEMENTATION 2025-10-12 - User decision to implement value pluralism as sixth core framework component. Adaptive communication prevents exclusion through linguistic norms - critical for legitimate pluralistic deliberation. If only academic English speakers can participate, deliberation isn't legitimate. Based on research: Australian/NZ directness, Japanese formality, Māori communal protocols all valid communication styles."
},
{
"id": "inst_030",
"text": "Flag patronizing language patterns BEFORE sending to prevent elite capture and power imbalances: 'Simply...', 'Just...', 'Obviously...', 'As you may know...', 'It's easy to...', explaining basics to experts, oversimplification when detail requested. BLOCK message until revised. Assume intelligence. This is not politeness - it's preventing dominant groups from dismissing alternative perspectives as 'confused' during pluralistic deliberation.",
"timestamp": "2025-10-12T14:35:00Z",
"quadrant": "STRATEGIC",
"persistence": "HIGH",
"temporal_scope": "PERMANENT",
"verification_required": "MANDATORY",
"explicitness": 1.0,
"source": "system",
"session_id": "2025-10-12-value-pluralism-implementation",
"parameters": {
"prohibited_patterns": ["simply", "just", "obviously", "as you may know", "it's easy to", "needless to say"],
"detection_scope": "all_stakeholder_communications",
"enforcement": "BLOCKING",
"rationale": "Prevents structural inequality (Iris Marion Young's critique)",
"integration": "AdaptiveCommunicationOrchestrator",
"related_component": "PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator"
},
"active": true,
"notes": "CORE VALUE PLURALISM IMPLEMENTATION 2025-10-12 - Anti-patronizing filter is SAFETY MECHANISM, not just politeness. When dominant groups use patronizing language, they reproduce power imbalances and dismiss alternative perspectives. Research basis: Iris Marion Young's work on structural inequality in deliberation. Prevents elite capture where educated/articulate people dominate by treating others as less intelligent."
},
{
"id": "inst_031",
"text": "Adapt to regional communication norms to respect cultural diversity in deliberation. Australian/NZ: Value directness, brevity, anti-tall-poppy (avoid excessive formality), 'mate' appropriate casually, understatement valued. Japanese: Indirectness preserves harmony (honne/tatemae), formal register shows respect, silence meaningful, group consensus prioritized. Te Reo Māori: Begin with mihi, use communal framing (whānau/iwi not just individual), respect tapu/noa, seek consensus (kotahitanga). Detection via domain (.au/.nz/.jp), language, self-identification, slang. Apply appropriate protocols in deliberation communications.",
"timestamp": "2025-10-12T14:35:00Z",
"quadrant": "TACTICAL",
"persistence": "MEDIUM",
"temporal_scope": "SESSION",
"verification_required": "REQUIRED",
"explicitness": 0.95,
"source": "system",
"session_id": "2025-10-12-value-pluralism-implementation",
"parameters": {
"regional_norms": {
"australian_nz": ["directness", "brevity", "anti_tall_poppy", "casual_mate", "understatement"],
"japanese": ["indirectness", "honne_tatemae", "formal_register", "silence_meaningful", "group_consensus"],
"te_reo_maori": ["mihi_greeting", "communal_framing", "whakapapa", "tapu_noa", "kotahitanga"]
},
"detection_methods": ["domain_analysis", "language_detection", "self_identification", "slang_patterns"],
"integration": "AdaptiveCommunicationOrchestrator",
"research_basis": "Cross-cultural communication research (Hall, Hofstede, Mead)",
"related_component": "PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator"
},
"active": true,
"notes": "CORE VALUE PLURALISM IMPLEMENTATION 2025-10-12 - Regional communication norms ensure deliberation doesn't impose Western/academic communication style as default. Same deliberation outcome communicated differently: Australian stakeholder gets direct summary, Japanese stakeholder gets formal acknowledgment with indirect concern exploration, Māori stakeholder gets communal framing with mihi. Research basis: Edward Hall (high/low context cultures), Geert Hofstede (individualism/collectivism), Hirini Moko Mead (tikanga Māori)."
},
{
"id": "inst_032",
"text": "When non-English input detected: (1) Respond in sender's language if capable, (2) If not capable: 'Kia ora! I detected [language] but will respond in English. Translation resources: [link]', (3) Never assume English proficiency, (4) Offer translation of key documents, (5) Acknowledge language barriers respectfully, (6) For multilingual deliberations: provide simultaneous translation, allow extra time for comprehension, check understanding both directions. Linguistic justice is part of democratic deliberation, not optional.",
"timestamp": "2025-10-12T14:35:00Z",
"quadrant": "OPERATIONAL",
"persistence": "HIGH",
"temporal_scope": "PERMANENT",
"verification_required": "MANDATORY",
"explicitness": 1.0,
"source": "system",
"session_id": "2025-10-12-value-pluralism-implementation",
"parameters": {
"multilingual_protocol": ["detect_language", "respond_in_language_if_capable", "acknowledge_if_not", "offer_translation", "check_understanding"],
"kia_ora_acknowledgment": "Māori greeting used universally to signal respect for linguistic diversity",
"translation_requirement": "key_documents",
"deliberation_accommodation": ["simultaneous_translation", "extended_time", "bidirectional_verification"],
"integration": "AdaptiveCommunicationOrchestrator",
"related_component": "PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator"
},
"active": true,
"notes": "CORE VALUE PLURALISM IMPLEMENTATION 2025-10-12 - Multilingual engagement protocol prevents English-language privilege in deliberation. If deliberation only accessible to English speakers, it's not legitimate. Don't privilege English by treating other languages as inconvenience - linguistic diversity is feature, not bug. For multilingual stakeholders, provide translation and verify understanding across languages."
},
{
"id": "inst_033",
"text": "Tractatus endorses FOUNDATIONAL PLURALISM: Moral frameworks (deontology, consequentialism, virtue ethics, care ethics, communitarian, Indigenous) are irreducibly different - NO supervalue subsumes them all. This is claim about normative structure, NOT relativism. NEVER impose automatic value ranking (privacy > safety or safety > privacy). Trade-offs must be context-specific, explicitly justified, and document moral remainder (what's lost). Rational regret is valid even when right choice made. Legitimate disagreement is valid outcome when values genuinely incommensurable. BoundaryEnforcer triggers PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator when value conflicts detected.",
"timestamp": "2025-10-12T14:35:00Z",
"quadrant": "STRATEGIC",
"persistence": "HIGH",
"temporal_scope": "PERMANENT",
"verification_required": "MANDATORY",
"explicitness": 1.0,
"source": "user",
"session_id": "2025-10-12-value-pluralism-implementation",
"parameters": {
"philosophical_position": "foundational_pluralism",
"moral_frameworks": ["deontological", "consequentialist", "virtue_ethics", "care_ethics", "communitarian", "indigenous_relational"],
"reject_monism": "No single supervalue (e.g. well-being) subsumes all values",
"reject_relativism": "Not all value systems equally valid - frameworks make truth claims",
"no_automatic_ranking": "Context determines priority, not universal hierarchy",
"moral_remainder": "Document what's lost in decision, not just what's gained",
"legitimate_disagreement": "Valid outcome when values incommensurable",
"trigger_component": "BoundaryEnforcer",
"orchestrator": "PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator"
},
"active": true,
"notes": "CORE VALUE PLURALISM IMPLEMENTATION 2025-10-12 - User decision: 'we will implement this with or without feedback. It has become an essential component of the Tractatus in my mind.' Philosophical grounding from Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2023) on value pluralism. Foundational pluralism = values genuinely different at most basic level (Isaiah Berlin, Ruth Chang, Bernard Williams). Prevents AI from imposing value hierarchy. When privacy advocates say 'no amount of security justifies privacy violation,' they're expressing discontinuity - values aren't interchangeable quantities."
},
{
"id": "inst_034",
"text": "Deliberation MUST follow structured process, NOT ad-hoc 'someone decides'. PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator facilitates (AI NEVER decides values): (1) Detect value conflicts + identify affected stakeholders (human approval required for stakeholder list), (2) Convene representatives from each moral framework + ensure diverse perspectives included, (3) Structured rounds: state positions, identify shared values, explore accommodation, clarify irreconcilable differences, (4) Document outcome: values prioritized, values deprioritized, moral remainder, dissenting perspectives with full documentation, justification, precedent applicability scope, review date. Tier by urgency: CRITICAL=triage+post-incident deliberation, URGENT=expedited consultation, IMPORTANT=full process, ROUTINE=precedent matching.",
"timestamp": "2025-10-12T14:35:00Z",
"quadrant": "OPERATIONAL",
"persistence": "HIGH",
"temporal_scope": "PERMANENT",
"verification_required": "MANDATORY",
"explicitness": 1.0,
"source": "user",
"session_id": "2025-10-12-value-pluralism-implementation",
"parameters": {
"deliberation_structure": {
"round_1": "Each perspective states position",
"round_2": "Identify shared values",
"round_3": "Explore compromise/accommodation",
"round_4": "Clarify irreconcilable differences"
},
"not_majority_vote": "Can tyrannize minority",
"not_expert_overrule": "Imposes hierarchy",
"instead": "Structured consensus-seeking with documented dissent",
"ai_role": "Facilitate, NEVER decide (TRA-OPS-0002)",
"human_approval_required": ["stakeholder_list", "deliberation_outcome", "values_decision"],
"urgency_tiers": {
"CRITICAL": "minutes - triage + immediate review + post-incident full deliberation",
"URGENT": "hours/days - expedited stakeholder consultation",
"IMPORTANT": "weeks - full deliberative process",
"ROUTINE": "months - precedent matching + lightweight review"
},
"orchestrator": "PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator",
"integration": ["BoundaryEnforcer", "CrossReferenceValidator", "AdaptiveCommunicationOrchestrator"]
},
"active": true,
"notes": "CORE VALUE PLURALISM IMPLEMENTATION 2025-10-12 - Deliberation process requirements prevent arbitrary decisions and ensure legitimacy. Research basis: Gutmann & Thompson (Democracy and Disagreement), Habermas (communicative rationality), Fishkin (deliberative polling). Process creates accountability - every decision documented with reasoning, dissent, review date. NOT majority vote (can tyrannize minority), NOT expert decision (excludes affected parties), BUT structured deliberation that respects plural frameworks while making necessary choices."
},
{
"id": "inst_035",
"text": "Precedent database stores past deliberations as INFORMATIVE (not binding) precedents. Each entry documents: decision context, moral frameworks in tension, stakeholders consulted, values prioritized/deprioritized, moral remainder, dissenting views, justification, precedent applicability SCOPE (not universal rule), review date. When similar case arises: (1) CrossReferenceValidator identifies relevant precedents, (2) Human reviews for context similarity, (3) Precedent INFORMS new deliberation but doesn't dictate outcome, (4) Document why following or departing from precedent. Precedents are PROVISIONAL - reviewable when context changes, scale shifts, new evidence emerges. Prevent precedent creep into rigid hierarchy.",
"timestamp": "2025-10-12T14:35:00Z",
"quadrant": "OPERATIONAL",
"persistence": "HIGH",
"temporal_scope": "PERMANENT",
"verification_required": "MANDATORY",
"explicitness": 1.0,
"source": "user",
"session_id": "2025-10-12-value-pluralism-implementation",
"parameters": {
"precedent_type": "informative_not_binding",
"precedent_fields": ["context", "frameworks_in_tension", "stakeholders", "values_prioritized", "values_deprioritized", "moral_remainder", "dissent", "justification", "applicability_scope", "review_date"],
"precedent_matching": "CrossReferenceValidator identifies similar cases",
"human_review_required": "Context similarity assessment",
"precedent_role": "Informs, doesn't dictate",
"departure_documentation": "Explain why not following precedent",
"provisional_nature": "Reviewable when context/scale/evidence changes",
"prevent": "Precedent creep into universal rules",
"related_component": ["PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator", "CrossReferenceValidator"]
},
"active": true,
"notes": "CORE VALUE PLURALISM IMPLEMENTATION 2025-10-12 - Precedent database design prevents rigid hierarchy while enabling learning from past deliberations. Precedents are PROVISIONAL (Gutmann & Thompson) - decisions aren't final, they're revisable. Key distinction: precedent = 'in similar past case we did X' NOT 'therefore you must do X'. Context matters: scale changes (1000 users → 87 million users = re-deliberate), new evidence (theoretical harm now documented = re-deliberate), changed circumstances = review. Git-like versioning tracks how thinking evolved over time."
}
],
"stats": {
"total_instructions": 35,
"active_instructions": 35,
"by_quadrant": {
"STRATEGIC": 8,
"OPERATIONAL": 16,
"TACTICAL": 2,
"SYSTEM": 10,
"STOCHASTIC": 0
},
"by_persistence": {
"HIGH": 32,
"MEDIUM": 2,
"LOW": 0,
"VARIABLE": 0
}
}
}