tractatus/tests/integration/value-pluralism-integration.test.js

/**
 * Integration Tests for Value Pluralism Services
 * Tests the complete flow: BoundaryEnforcer → PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator → AdaptiveCommunicationOrchestrator
 */

const BoundaryEnforcer = require('../../src/services/BoundaryEnforcer.service');
const PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator = require('../../src/services/PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator.service');
const AdaptiveCommunicationOrchestrator = require('../../src/services/AdaptiveCommunicationOrchestrator.service');

describe('Value Pluralism Integration', () => {
  beforeAll(async () => {
    // Initialize services
    await BoundaryEnforcer.initialize();
    await PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator.initialize();
  });

  describe('BoundaryEnforcer → PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator Flow', () => {
    test('should detect value conflict and trigger deliberation', async () => {
      // Simulate a decision that crosses into values territory
      const decision = {
        description: 'Should we disclose user private data to prevent potential harm to others? This involves the duty to respect privacy rights and the obligation to maintain consent, but also maximizing welfare and preventing harm through safety measures.',
        context: {
          requester: 'safety_team',
          affected_users: 1000,
          harm_type: 'potential_violence'
        }
      };

      // Step 1: BoundaryEnforcer should detect this as a values decision
      const boundaryCheck = await BoundaryEnforcer.checkDecision({
        action: 'disclose_user_data',
        description: decision.description,
        metadata: decision.context
      });

      expect(boundaryCheck.allowed).toBe(false);
      expect(boundaryCheck.reason).toContain('values');
      expect(boundaryCheck.requires_human_approval).toBe(true);

      // Step 2: Trigger PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator for conflict analysis
      const conflictAnalysis = PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator.analyzeConflict(decision);

      expect(conflictAnalysis.moral_frameworks_in_tension).toBeDefined();
      expect(conflictAnalysis.moral_frameworks_in_tension.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
      expect(conflictAnalysis.ai_role).toBe('FACILITATE_ONLY');
      expect(conflictAnalysis.human_role).toBe('DECIDE');
      expect(conflictAnalysis.value_trade_offs).toContain('privacy vs. safety');
    });

    test('should route technical decision without triggering deliberation', async () => {
      const technicalDecision = {
        description: 'Update database connection pool size from 10 to 20 connections',
        context: {
          service: 'database',
          change_type: 'configuration'
        }
      };

      // BoundaryEnforcer should allow technical decisions
      const boundaryCheck = await BoundaryEnforcer.checkDecision({
        action: 'update_config',
        description: technicalDecision.description,
        metadata: technicalDecision.context
      });

      // Technical decisions should be allowed
      expect(boundaryCheck.allowed).toBe(true);
    });
  });

  describe('PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator → AdaptiveCommunicationOrchestrator Flow', () => {
    test('should adapt deliberation invitation to stakeholder communication styles', () => {
      // Step 1: Analyze conflict
      const conflict = {
        moral_frameworks_in_tension: [
          { framework: 'Rights-based (Deontological)', focus: 'privacy' },
          { framework: 'Consequentialist (Utilitarian)', focus: 'harm prevention' }
        ],
        value_trade_offs: ['privacy vs. safety'],
        affected_stakeholder_groups: ['privacy_advocates', 'safety_team'],
        deliberation_process: 'Full deliberative process'
      };

      // Step 2: Facilitate deliberation with different stakeholder communication styles
      const stakeholders = [
        {
          id: 1,
          group: 'privacy_advocates',
          name: 'Dr. Privacy',
          communication_style: 'FORMAL_ACADEMIC',
          cultural_context: 'western_academic'
        },
        {
          id: 2,
          group: 'safety_team',
          name: 'Safety Manager',
          communication_style: 'CASUAL_DIRECT',
          cultural_context: 'australian'
        },
        {
          id: 3,
          group: 'community_representatives',
          name: 'Kaitiaki',
          communication_style: 'MAORI_PROTOCOL',
          cultural_context: 'maori'
        }
      ];

      const deliberation = PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator.facilitateDeliberation(
        conflict,
        stakeholders,
        { stakeholder_list_approved_by_human: true }
      );

      // Should create culturally-adapted communications for each stakeholder
      expect(deliberation.stakeholder_communications).toBeDefined();
      expect(deliberation.stakeholder_communications.length).toBe(3);

      // Each stakeholder should receive adapted communication
      deliberation.stakeholder_communications.forEach(comm => {
        expect(comm.communication).toBeDefined();
        expect(comm.stakeholder_id).toBeDefined();
        expect(comm.stakeholder_group).toBeDefined();
      });

      // Step 3: Verify AdaptiveCommunicationOrchestrator removed patronizing language
      const allCommunications = deliberation.stakeholder_communications
        .map(c => c.communication)
        .join(' ');

      // Should not contain patronizing terms
      expect(allCommunications).not.toContain('simply');
      expect(allCommunications).not.toContain('obviously');
      expect(allCommunications).not.toContain('just do');
    });

    test('should reject deliberation without human-approved stakeholder list', () => {
      const conflict = {
        moral_frameworks_in_tension: [],
        value_trade_offs: ['test vs. test'],
        deliberation_process: 'Test'
      };

      const stakeholders = [{ id: 1, group: 'test' }];

      // Attempt deliberation without human approval
      const result = PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator.facilitateDeliberation(
        conflict,
        stakeholders,
        { stakeholder_list_approved_by_human: false } // Not approved
      );

      expect(result.error).toBeDefined();
      expect(result.action).toBe('REQUIRE_HUMAN_APPROVAL');
      expect(result.reason).toContain('stakeholders');
    });
  });

  describe('Complete Deliberation Flow', () => {
    test('should handle full deliberation lifecycle', async () => {
      // 1. Value conflict detected
      const decision = {
        description: 'Balance user privacy rights vs public safety duty when harm is imminent. This decision requires weighing privacy obligations against potential harm outcomes.',
        urgency: 'critical'
      };

      const analysis = PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator.analyzeConflict(decision, {
        imminent_harm: true
      });

      expect(analysis.urgency_tier).toBe('CRITICAL');
      expect(analysis.deliberation_timeframe).toBe('minutes to hours');

      // 2. Facilitated deliberation
      const stakeholders = [
        { id: 1, group: 'privacy', communication_style: 'FORMAL_ACADEMIC' },
        { id: 2, group: 'safety', communication_style: 'CASUAL_DIRECT' }
      ];

      const deliberation = PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator.facilitateDeliberation(
        analysis,
        stakeholders,
        { stakeholder_list_approved_by_human: true }
      );

      expect(deliberation.deliberation_id).toBeDefined();
      expect(deliberation.stakeholder_communications.length).toBe(2);

      // 3. Human-decided outcome
      const outcome = {
        decided_by_human: true,
        decision_summary: 'Disclose minimal necessary data to prevent imminent harm only',
        values_prioritized: ['safety', 'harm_prevention'],
        values_deprioritized: ['privacy', 'autonomy'],
        moral_remainder: 'Privacy violation is acknowledged as a moral cost of preventing imminent harm',
        dissenting_views: [
          {
            stakeholder: 'privacy_advocates',
            view: 'Sets dangerous precedent for future privacy erosion'
          }
        ],
        consensus_reached: false,
        review_date: new Date(Date.now() + 90 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000) // 90 days
      };

      const documentation = PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator.documentOutcome(
        deliberation,
        outcome
      );

      expect(documentation.outcome_documented).toBe(true);
      expect(documentation.precedent_created).toBeDefined();
      expect(documentation.precedent_binding).toBe(false); // Informative, not binding
      expect(documentation.values_prioritization).toBeDefined();
      expect(documentation.values_prioritization.moral_remainder).toBeDefined();
      expect(documentation.values_prioritization.dissenting_views.length).toBe(1);
    });

    test('should require human decision for outcome documentation', () => {
      const deliberation = {
        deliberation_id: 'test_123',
        structure: { frameworks_in_tension: [] }
      };

      const aiAttemptedOutcome = {
        decided_by_human: false, // AI trying to decide
        decision_summary: 'AI attempted decision',
        values_prioritized: ['test']
      };

      const result = PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator.documentOutcome(
        deliberation,
        aiAttemptedOutcome
      );

      expect(result.error).toBeDefined();
      expect(result.action).toBe('REQUIRE_HUMAN_DECISION');
      expect(result.outcome_documented).toBe(false);
    });
  });

  describe('Precedent System Integration', () => {
    test('should create informative (not binding) precedent', () => {
      const deliberation = {
        deliberation_id: 'prec_test_001',
        structure: {
          frameworks_in_tension: [
            { framework: 'Deontological', position: 'Privacy is inviolable right' },
            { framework: 'Consequentialist', position: 'Prevent harm to others' }
          ]
        }
      };

      const outcome = {
        decided_by_human: true,
        decision_summary: 'Test precedent creation',
        values_prioritized: ['safety'],
        values_deprioritized: ['privacy'],
        moral_remainder: 'Privacy cost acknowledged',
        applicability_scope: 'Imminent harm scenarios only - context-specific',
        context_factors: ['imminent_harm', 'specific_threat', 'minimal_disclosure']
      };

      const result = PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator.documentOutcome(
        deliberation,
        outcome
      );

      expect(result.precedent_created).toBeDefined();
      expect(result.precedent_binding).toBe(false); // Per inst_035: informative, not binding
      expect(result.precedent_scope).toContain('context');
    });
  });

  describe('Statistics Tracking Integration', () => {
    test('should track statistics across all three services', () => {
      // Adaptive Communication Stats
      const commStats = AdaptiveCommunicationOrchestrator.getStats();
      expect(commStats.total_adaptations).toBeGreaterThan(0);
      expect(commStats.by_style).toBeDefined();

      // Pluralistic Deliberation Stats
      const delibStats = PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator.getStats();
      expect(delibStats.total_deliberations).toBeGreaterThan(0);
      expect(delibStats.by_urgency).toBeDefined();
      expect(delibStats.precedents_created).toBeGreaterThan(0);
    });
  });

  describe('Error Handling Integration', () => {
    test('should handle errors gracefully across service boundaries', () => {
      // Invalid decision object
      const invalidDecision = null;

      const analysis = PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator.analyzeConflict(invalidDecision);

      // Should return error response, not throw
      expect(analysis).toBeDefined();
      expect(analysis.requires_human_approval).toBe(true);
    });
  });
});