1901378a9f
ASSESSMENT: Framework effectiveness rated 4/10 this session - Hooks work (reactive enforcement) ✅ - But don't guide decisions (proactive assistance) ❌ - Metrics collected but not actionable ❌ - Rules exist but aren't consulted during work ❌ KEY FINDING: Framework missed 15+ inst_017 violations for weeks - Only caught when user manually requested audit - No proactive scanning or detection - Framework was REACTIVE, not PROACTIVE TOP 3 IMPROVEMENTS PLANNED: 1. Proactive Content Scanning (5-7 hours) - Auto-scan for inst_016/017/018 violations on session start - Pre-commit hook to prevent violations - Would have caught all 15 violations immediately 2. Context-Aware Rule Surfacing (8-9 hours) - Surface relevant rules based on activity - Editing markdown? Show inst_016/017/018 - Debugging? Show inst_050/024 - Makes 52 rules actionable when relevant 3. Active MetacognitiveVerifier (9-11 hours) - Detect patterns (repeated failures, same file edited 5x) - Suggest relevant solutions ("Try minimal reproduction") - Would have guided integration test debugging IMPLEMENTATION: - Total effort: 32-40 hours (1 month part-time) - Expected effectiveness: 4/10 → 8/10 - ROI: HIGH - Prevents violations, guides work, reduces debugging time See: docs/framework-improvements/IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN_2025-10-21.md 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| metrics | ||
| session-archive | ||
| sessions | ||
| framework-incidents.json | ||
| instruction-history.json | ||
| instruction-history.json.backup-20251012-143441 | ||
| plan-registry.json | ||
| tractatus-config.json | ||
| user-suggestions.json | ||