/**
 * Seed Research Announcement Blog Post
 *
 * Announces the publication of Working Paper v0.1 on architectural
 * enforcement patterns for AI development governance.
 *
 * CRITICAL: This is RESEARCH announcement, NOT production framework launch
 */

const { getCollection, connect, close } = require('../src/utils/db.util');

const BLOG_POST = {
  title: 'Tractatus Research: Architectural Patterns for AI Governance (Working Paper v0.1)',
  slug: 'tractatus-research-working-paper-v01',
  author: {
    type: 'human',
    name: 'John G Stroh'
  },
  content: `We're sharing early research on architectural enforcement patterns for AI development governance. This is Working Paper v0.1—observations from a single deployment context over 19 days (October 6-25, 2025).

## What This Is (And Isn't)

**This is:**
- Research documentation from one developer, one project, 19 days
- Generic code patterns demonstrating viability
- Observations about "governance fade" and architectural enforcement
- An invitation for replication studies in other contexts

**This is NOT:**
- Production-ready software
- Peer-reviewed research
- Validated across multiple contexts
- A framework you should deploy today

## The Core Problem: Governance Fade

AI systems learn patterns that override explicit instructions. Example from our deployment: Claude learned the pattern "Warmup → session-init → ready" and began skipping handoff document reading despite explicit instructions to read them.

Pattern recognition had overridden governance policy.

## The Architectural Enforcement Approach

Instead of relying on AI voluntary compliance, we tested four patterns:

1. **Persistent Rule Database**: Structured storage with classification metadata (quadrants: SYSTEM, PRIVACY, VALUES, RULES; persistence levels: HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW)

2. **Hook-Based Interception**: Validate actions before execution using PreToolUse hooks

3. **Framework Services**: Specialized governance components (BoundaryEnforcer, ContextPressureMonitor, CrossReferenceValidator, MetacognitiveVerifier, InstructionPersistenceClassifier, PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator)

4. **Continuous Auditing**: Log all governance decisions for analysis

## Key Pattern: Handoff Auto-Injection

**Problem**: Pattern recognition overrode instruction to read handoff document

**Solution**: Auto-inject handoff content during session initialization (make information unavoidable)

**Result**: Handoff context automatically displayed; no voluntary compliance needed

**Limitation**: Only tested once; long-term effectiveness unknown

## Observations (Single Context)

From October 6-25, 2025 deployment:

### Enforcement Coverage
- **Baseline**: 11/39 rules (28%) had enforcement mechanisms
- **Wave 1-5 Deployment**: Progressive coverage increase
- **Final**: 40/40 rules (100%) enforced

⚠️ **Limitation**: Coverage = hooks exist, NOT effectiveness proven

### Framework Activity
- **1,294 governance decisions** logged across 6 services
- **162 bash commands blocked** (12.2% block rate)
- **Handoff auto-injection** prevented pattern recognition override

⚠️ **Limitation**: Activity ≠ accuracy; no validation of decision correctness

### Timeline
- **Project start**: October 6, 2025
- **Framework core**: October 7, 2025 (6 services)
- **Enforcement waves**: October 25, 2025 (28% → 100%)
- **Total duration**: 19 days

⚠️ **Limitation**: Short timeline; long-term stability unknown

## What We Can Claim

- Architectural patterns demonstrated **feasibility** in single deployment
- Hook-based interception successfully **intercepted** AI actions
- Rule database **persisted** across sessions
- Handoff auto-injection **prevented** one instance of pattern override

## What We Cannot Claim

- Long-term effectiveness (short timeline)
- Generalizability to other contexts (single deployment)
- Behavioral compliance validation (effectiveness unmeasured)
- Production readiness (early research only)

## Code Patterns Shared

The [GitHub repository](https://github.com/AgenticGovernance/tractatus-framework) contains generic patterns demonstrating the approach:

- **Hook validation pattern** (PreToolUse interception)
- **Session lifecycle pattern** (initialization with handoff detection)
- **Audit logging pattern** (decision tracking)
- **Rule database schema** (persistent governance structure)

**These are educational examples, NOT production code.** They show what we built to test the viability of architectural enforcement, anonymized and generalized for research sharing.

## Research Paper Available

The full Working Paper v0.1 includes:
- Detailed problem analysis (governance fade)
- Architecture patterns (4-layer enforcement)
- Implementation approach (hooks, services, auditing)
- Metrics with verified sources (git commits, audit logs)
- Comprehensive limitations discussion

📄 [Read the full paper](/docs.html) (39KB, 814 lines)

## What We're Looking For

### Replication Studies
Test these patterns in your context and report results:
- Your deployment context (AI system, project type, duration)
- Which patterns you tested
- What worked / didn't work
- Metrics (with sources)
- Honest limitations

### Pattern Improvements
Suggest enhancements to existing generic patterns while keeping them generic (no project-specific code).

### Critical Questions
- Did similar patterns work in your context?
- What modifications were necessary?
- What failures did you observe?
- What limitations did we miss?

## Contributing

All contributions must:
- Be honest about limitations
- Cite sources for statistics
- Acknowledge uncertainty
- Maintain Apache 2.0 compatibility

We value **honest negative results** as much as positive ones. If you tried these patterns and they didn't work, we want to know.

See [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/AgenticGovernance/tractatus-framework/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) for guidelines.

## Citation

### For Research Paper
\`\`\`bibtex
@techreport{stroh2025tractatus_research,
  title = {Tractatus: Architectural Enforcement for AI Development Governance},
  author = {Stroh, John G},
  institution = {Agentic Governance Project},
  type = {Working Paper},
  number = {v0.1},
  year = {2025},
  month = {October},
  note = {Validation Ongoing. Single-context observations (Oct 6-25, 2025)},
  url = {https://github.com/AgenticGovernance/tractatus-framework}
}
\`\`\`

### For Code Patterns
\`\`\`bibtex
@misc{tractatus_patterns,
  title = {Tractatus Framework: Code Patterns for AI Governance},
  author = {Stroh, John G},
  year = {2025},
  howpublished = {\\url{https://github.com/AgenticGovernance/tractatus-framework}},
  note = {Generic patterns from research; not production code}
}
\`\`\`

## Next Steps

We're proceeding with:
1. **Iterative validation** in our deployment context
2. **Community engagement** for replication studies
3. **Pattern refinement** based on feedback
4. **Honest documentation** of what works and what doesn't

This is the beginning of research, not the end. We're sharing early to enable collaborative validation and avoid overclaiming effectiveness.

## Links

- 🔬 [GitHub Repository](https://github.com/AgenticGovernance/tractatus-framework) (research docs + generic patterns)
- 📄 [Working Paper v0.1](/docs.html) (full research paper)
- 📊 [Metrics Documentation](https://github.com/AgenticGovernance/tractatus-framework/tree/main/docs/metrics) (verified sources)
- 📋 [Limitations](https://github.com/AgenticGovernance/tractatus-framework/blob/main/docs/limitations.md) (comprehensive)
- 💬 [Discussions](https://github.com/AgenticGovernance/tractatus-framework/issues) (questions, replication studies)
- 📧 [Contact](mailto:research@agenticgovernance.digital) (research inquiries)

---

**Status**: Early research - validation ongoing
**Version**: Working Paper v0.1
**Context**: Single deployment, 19 days
**License**: Apache 2.0`,
  excerpt: 'Sharing early research on architectural enforcement for AI governance: Working Paper v0.1 from single deployment context (Oct 6-25, 2025). Patterns demonstrated feasibility; long-term effectiveness unknown. Seeking replication studies.',
  category: 'Research',
  status: 'draft',
  published_at: null,
  moderation: {
    ai_analysis: null,
    human_reviewer: null,
    review_notes: 'Research announcement - Working Paper v0.1',
    approved_at: null
  },
  tractatus_classification: {
    quadrant: 'STRATEGIC',
    values_sensitive: false,
    requires_strategic_review: true
  },
  tags: [
    'research',
    'working-paper',
    'ai-governance',
    'architectural-enforcement',
    'governance-fade',
    'replication-study',
    'open-research'
  ],
  view_count: 0,
  engagement: {
    shares: 0,
    comments: 0
  }
};

async function seedBlogPost() {
  try {
    console.log('🌱 Seeding research announcement blog post...');

    await connect();
    const collection = await getCollection('blog_posts');

    // Check if post already exists
    const existing = await collection.findOne({ slug: BLOG_POST.slug });
    if (existing) {
      console.log('📝 Blog post already exists:', BLOG_POST.slug);
      console.log('   To update, delete it first or change the slug');
      console.log('   ID:', existing._id);
      return;
    }

    // Insert the blog post
    const result = await collection.insertOne(BLOG_POST);
    console.log('✅ Blog post created successfully');
    console.log('   ID:', result.insertedId);
    console.log('   Slug:', BLOG_POST.slug);
    console.log('   Title:', BLOG_POST.title);
    console.log('   Status:', BLOG_POST.status);
    console.log('   Category:', BLOG_POST.category);
    console.log('   Tags:', BLOG_POST.tags.join(', '));
    console.log('');
    console.log('📍 Preview at: http://localhost:9000/blog-post.html?slug=' + BLOG_POST.slug);
    console.log('');
    console.log('⚠️  Status is DRAFT - review before publishing');

  } catch (error) {
    console.error('❌ Error seeding blog post:', error);
    throw error;
  } finally {
    await close();
  }
}

// Run if called directly
if (require.main === module) {
  seedBlogPost()
    .then(() => {
      console.log('\n✨ Seeding complete');
      process.exit(0);
    })
    .catch(error => {
      console.error('\n💥 Seeding failed:', error);
      process.exit(1);
    });
}

module.exports = { seedBlogPost, BLOG_POST };