/** * Add Governance Evolution Banners to Blog Posts * Demonstrates framework catching its own content violations */ const { MongoClient } = require('mongodb'); // Can be overridden by environment variable for production deployment const DEV_URI = process.env.MONGODB_URI || 'mongodb://localhost:27017'; const DEV_DB = process.env.MONGODB_DB || 'tractatus_dev'; // Banner templates const BANNERS = { 'five-component-tractatus-architecture': `
This blog was written in early October 2025 describing our five-component architecture. When we ran it through updated governance rules in late October 2025, the framework flagged language that violated newly-added instructions:
This is the framework working as designed. As governance rules evolve, they catch content that previously passed review. Rather than silently revise, we're leaving this as a live demonstration of how architectural governance improves over time. Read our framework failure case study for more on transparent error handling.
Note: This blog describes early-stage research (single-project validation). The framework components exist and function, but have not been validated across multiple production deployments.
This introductory blog was written in early October 2025. Updated governance rules (inst_017, inst_018) now flag absolute assurance language like "guarantees" and unvalidated production readiness claims.
The framework caught its own content. Rather than silently revise, we're demonstrating transparent governance evolution. The framework components described here exist and function in single-project deployment, but have not been validated at scale.
This roadmap blog was written in mid-October 2025. Updated governance rules (inst_017) now flag absolute assurance language. The framework detected violations in its own published content - demonstrating that architectural governance improves through iteration.
Rather than silently edit, we're preserving this as evidence of transparent evolution. See: Framework failure case study
This blog contains prohibited terms in quoted examples for educational purposes. Terms like "guarantee", "production-ready", and "battle-tested" appear in:
These educational uses demonstrate what not to do - they are not claims made by the framework itself.