john/tractatus
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
777 commits 1 branch 0 tags 125 MiB
Commit graph

4 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
TheFlow
df8c6ccb03 fix: Remove absolute assurance language per inst_017 across codebase 
Replace "ensures", "guarantee", "foolproof", "world-class" and similar
absolute terms with evidence-based language throughout public pages, JS
components, and FAQ content. Changes apply inst_017 (no absolute
assurance terms) consistently.

Replacements:
- "ensures X" → "validates X", "so that X", "supports X", "maintains X"
- "guarantee" → removed or rephrased with qualified language
- "foolproof" → "infallible"
- "architecturally impossible" → "architecture prevents without
  explicit override flags"

Preserved: published research papers (architectural-alignment*.html),
EU AI Act quotes, Te Tiriti treaty language, and FAQ meta-commentary
that deliberately critiques this language (lines 2842-2896).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2026-02-07 14:44:45 +13:00
TheFlow
2298d36bed fix(submissions): restructure Economist package and fix article display 
- Create Economist SubmissionTracking package correctly:
  * mainArticle = full blog post content
  * coverLetter = 216-word SIR— letter
  * Links to blog post via blogPostId
- Archive 'Letter to The Economist' from blog posts (it's the cover letter)
- Fix date display on article cards (use published_at)
- Target publication already displaying via blue badge

Database changes:
- Make blogPostId optional in SubmissionTracking model
- Economist package ID: 68fa85ae49d4900e7f2ecd83
- Le Monde package ID: 68fa2abd2e6acd5691932150

Next: Enhanced modal with tabs, validation, export

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2025-10-24 08:47:42 +13:00
TheFlow
6496e0d811 refactor: remove entire public/ directory - Tractatus PROJECT web interface 
REMOVED: All 37 files in public/ directory

This is the Tractatus PROJECT's web interface (admin system, website features),
NOT framework implementation code.

Files removed:
- Admin system (4 pages): dashboard, hooks-dashboard, login, rule-manager
  - Shows: Moderation Queue, Users, Documents, Blog Curation
  - This is OUR project admin, not tools for framework implementers
- Admin JavaScript (8 files)
- CSS/fonts (10 files)
- Images (4 files)
- Components (3 files): interactive-diagram, navbar-admin, pressure-chart
- Demos (5 files): 27027, boundary, classification, deliberation, tractatus
- Utils (1 file): api.js
- Favicons (2 files)

REASON: public/ directory contained Tractatus PROJECT website/admin interface.
Framework implementers don't need OUR admin system - they build their own.

All web interface code belongs in internal repository only.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2025-10-21 21:57:02 +13:00
TheFlow
2e5756a43c feat(demos): create interactive pluralistic deliberation demo 
SUMMARY:
Completed Phase 3 Task 3.4.2 - Created comprehensive interactive demo
showing how PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator facilitates multi-stakeholder
values deliberation without making autonomous normative choices.

NEW DEMO: PLURALISTIC DELIBERATION

**Scenario:**
Security vulnerability discovery - should AI report it publicly, fix quietly,
or coordinate disclosure? This creates values conflicts between:
- Developer reputation vs. user safety
- Organizational liability vs. transparency
- Community norms vs. market dynamics

**Interactive Features:**

1. **Two Paths:**
   - Autonomous Decision: Shows why AI can't/shouldn't decide values
   - Deliberation: Shows framework facilitation in action

2. **Stakeholder Selection (Step 1):**
   - 6 stakeholder types to choose from
   - Developer, End Users, Organization, Security Community, Competitors, Regulators
   - Each with distinct icon, color, perspective
   - Clickable cards with visual selection state
   - Requires minimum 2 stakeholders to proceed

3. **Perspective Exploration (Step 2):**
   - Dynamically shows selected stakeholders' views
   - Each perspective includes:
     * Primary concern
     * Full viewpoint explanation
     * Priority statement
   - Color-coded by stakeholder type
   - No ranking or weighting applied

4. **Human Decision (Step 3):**
   - 4 decision options provided:
     * Full Disclosure (transparency priority)
     * Private Fix (balance approach)
     * Coordinated Disclosure (community norms)
     * Defer Decision (consult more stakeholders)
   - Framework facilitates but doesn't decide
   - Human makes final choice

5. **Explanation Section:**
   - Side-by-side comparison:
     * What framework DOES (facilitate, surface, record)
     * What framework DOESN'T DO (weight, rank, decide)
   - Explains values pluralism principle
   - Reset button to try different stakeholder combinations

**Design Patterns:**

- Teal color scheme (deliberation service brand color)
- Service icon in header (multi-stakeholder symbol)
- Fade-in animations for smooth UX
- Responsive grid layouts
- Hover effects on all interactive elements
- Clear visual states (selected, active, clickable)

**Stakeholder Perspectives (6 total):**

1. **Developer**: Reputation & timeline concerns
2. **End Users**: Data safety & transparency rights
3. **Organization**: Liability & brand protection
4. **Security Community**: Responsible disclosure norms
5. **Competitors**: Market dynamics
6. **Regulators**: Compliance & user rights (GDPR)

Each stakeholder has:
- Unique icon and color
- Specific concern area
- Full perspective explanation
- Priority statement

**Educational Value:**

- Demonstrates values incommensurability
- Shows why AI shouldn't autonomously decide normative questions
- Illustrates framework's facilitation role
- Highlights human agency preservation
- Explains pluralistic deliberation principle

**Technical Details:**

HTML (deliberation-demo.html):
- 3-step interactive flow
- Autonomous vs. deliberation path choice
- Dynamic stakeholder cards
- Dynamic perspective rendering
- 4 decision options
- Comprehensive explanation section

JavaScript (deliberation-demo.js):
- 6 stakeholder definitions with full data
- Selection state management
- Dynamic content rendering
- Event handlers for all interactions
- Reset functionality
- Smooth scrolling between sections

**CSP Compliance:**
✓ Zero violations
✓ No inline event handlers
✓ Event listeners properly attached
✓ Dynamic content via DOM manipulation

**Accessibility:**
- Semantic HTML structure
- Clear visual states
- Keyboard navigation supported
- Color-coded with text labels
- Responsive design maintained

**Impact:**
Completes ALL Phase 3 interactive features. Users can now:
✓ Understand how deliberation differs from decision-making
✓ Explore different stakeholder perspectives interactively
✓ Experience values pluralism firsthand
✓ See why AI autonomous normative choices are problematic

This demo, combined with the enhanced 27027 incident demo, provides
complete interactive validation of the Tractatus framework's two key
architectural principles:
1. Pattern override prevention (27027 demo)
2. Pluralistic deliberation (this demo)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2025-10-19 22:03:25 +13:00