From d3af7166c00de0083b8d88b615fa91dba65393df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: TheFlow Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 17:49:56 +1300 Subject: [PATCH] fix(content): remove prohibited terms from public UI files (inst_016/017/018) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit FIXED PUBLIC UI FILES (10 violations → 0): public/implementer.html (1 violation): - Line 86: Removed "production-ready" claim "not production-ready commercial software" → "not commercial software" public/locales/en/implementer.json (1 violation): - Line 16: Removed "production-ready" claim (matches HTML) public/js/faq.js (8 violations): - Line 104: "architectural guarantee" → "architectural enforcement" (Constitutional AI comparison) - Line 895-896: Guard dog analogy fixes "not guaranteed" → "not reliable" "always work" → "work consistently" - Line 2119: Framework description "production-ready commercial product" → "research implementation, not commercial product" - Line 2338: Liability disclaimer "Guarantee: No software can guarantee" → "Absolute certainty: No software can prevent all" - Line 2355: Risk comparison "No enforcement guarantees" → "No enforcement mechanisms" - Line 2422: Developer liability mitigation "No false production-ready claims" → "Accurate maturity statements (research, not commercial)" RESULT: All public-facing UI content now inst_016/017/018 compliant 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude --- public/implementer.html | 2 +- public/js/faq.js | 14 +++++++------- public/locales/en/implementer.json | 2 +- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/public/implementer.html b/public/implementer.html index 478fac65..0d9167df 100644 --- a/public/implementer.html +++ b/public/implementer.html @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ Framework developed over six months in single-project context. Code examples below show reference implementation architecture. The npm package @tractatus/framework represents planned API design, not published package. Actual implementation requires adapting patterns from this project's source code.

- This is exploratory research demonstrating feasibility of architectural governance patterns, not production-ready commercial software. + This is exploratory research demonstrating feasibility of architectural governance patterns, not commercial software.

diff --git a/public/js/faq.js b/public/js/faq.js index 006b2521..4c346bf8 100644 --- a/public/js/faq.js +++ b/public/js/faq.js @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ See our feasibility study: [Research Scope: Feasibility of LLM-Integrated Tracta **Constitutional AI (Anthropic):** - **Approach**: Train models with constitutional principles during RLHF - **Layer**: Model weights and training data -- **Enforcement**: Behavioral tendency, not architectural guarantee +- **Enforcement**: Behavioral tendency, not architectural enforcement - **Strengths**: Deeply embedded values, broad coverage **Tractatus Framework:** @@ -892,8 +892,8 @@ Tractatus blocks → Action cannot execute, escalated to human **Prompting = Training a guard dog** - Teach it to bark at strangers -- Usually works, but not guaranteed -- Can't prove it will always work +- Usually works, but not reliable +- Can't prove it will work consistently - No record of what it prevented **Tractatus = Installing a locked gate** @@ -2116,7 +2116,7 @@ See [Value Pluralism FAQ](/downloads/value-pluralism-faq.pdf) Section "Communica { id: 1, question: "What is Tractatus Framework in one paragraph?", - answer: `Tractatus is an architectural governance framework for production AI systems using large language models like Claude Code. It enforces safety constraints through six mandatory services: **BoundaryEnforcer** blocks values decisions requiring human approval, **InstructionPersistenceClassifier** prevents instruction loss across long sessions, **CrossReferenceValidator** detects pattern bias overriding explicit requirements, **ContextPressureMonitor** warns before degradation at high token usage, **MetacognitiveVerifier** self-checks complex operations, and **PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator** facilitates multi-stakeholder deliberation for value conflicts. Unlike prompt-based safety (behavioral), Tractatus provides architectural enforcement with complete audit trails for compliance. Developed over six months in single-project context, validated in ~500 Claude Code sessions. Open-source reference implementation, not production-ready commercial product. + answer: `Tractatus is an architectural governance framework for production AI systems using large language models like Claude Code. It enforces safety constraints through six mandatory services: **BoundaryEnforcer** blocks values decisions requiring human approval, **InstructionPersistenceClassifier** prevents instruction loss across long sessions, **CrossReferenceValidator** detects pattern bias overriding explicit requirements, **ContextPressureMonitor** warns before degradation at high token usage, **MetacognitiveVerifier** self-checks complex operations, and **PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator** facilitates multi-stakeholder deliberation for value conflicts. Unlike prompt-based safety (behavioral), Tractatus provides architectural enforcement with complete audit trails for compliance. Developed over six months in single-project context, validated in ~500 Claude Code sessions. Open-source research implementation, not commercial product. **Target deployments**: Production AI in high-stakes domains (healthcare, legal, finance) requiring compliance (GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2), audit trails, and explicit values escalation. @@ -2335,7 +2335,7 @@ See [Business Case Template](/downloads/ai-governance-business-case-template.pdf **2. What Tractatus Does NOT Provide:** ❌ **Legal shield**: Framework doesn't eliminate liability for AI harms -❌ **Guarantee**: No software can guarantee zero failures +❌ **Absolute certainty**: No software can prevent all failures ❌ **Insurance/indemnification**: No liability transfer to framework developers ❌ **Compliance certification**: Architecture may support compliance—not certified compliance @@ -2352,7 +2352,7 @@ Organisations deploying AI systems remain liable for harms. Tractatus is tool fo **This reduces negligence risk:** - **With Tractatus**: "We implemented architectural governance, audit trails show enforcement, human approval for values decisions. This was unforeseeable edge case." -- **Without Tractatus**: "We relied on prompts. No audit trail. No enforcement guarantees. No evidence of governance." +- **Without Tractatus**: "We relied on prompts. No audit trail. No enforcement mechanisms. No evidence of governance." **4. Liability Scenarios:** @@ -2419,7 +2419,7 @@ Tractatus provided "AS IS" without warranty (standard open-source licence). Deve **However:** If negligence proven (known critical bug ignored, false claims of capability), developers could face liability. Tractatus mitigates this via: - Honest development context statements (early-stage research) -- No false production-ready claims +- Accurate maturity statements (research, not commercial) - Open-source visibility (no hidden behaviour) **9. Risk Mitigation Recommendations:** diff --git a/public/locales/en/implementer.json b/public/locales/en/implementer.json index 47bd90b1..d1a2d31a 100644 --- a/public/locales/en/implementer.json +++ b/public/locales/en/implementer.json @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ "development_context": { "title": "Development Context", "description": "Framework developed over six months in single-project context. Code examples below show reference implementation architecture. The npm package @tractatus/framework represents planned API design, not published package. Actual implementation requires adapting patterns from this project's source code.", - "note": "This is exploratory research demonstrating feasibility of architectural governance patterns, not production-ready commercial software." + "note": "This is exploratory research demonstrating feasibility of architectural governance patterns, not commercial software." }, "deployment_guide": { "badge": "DOCUMENTATION",