diff --git a/public/demos/27027-demo.html b/public/demos/27027-demo.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000..7f2d1708 --- /dev/null +++ b/public/demos/27027-demo.html @@ -0,0 +1,356 @@ + + +
+ + ++ A real-world failure mode where AI contradicted an explicit instruction, + and how the Tractatus framework would have prevented it. +
++ The 27027 incident represents a class of failures where AI systems contradict explicit instructions + due to context degradation, attention decay, or simple forgetfulness. These failures can cause: +
++ Tractatus prevents this entirely through persistent instruction storage and + cross-reference validation before code execution. +
++ See how the Tractatus framework distinguishes between decisions that can be + automated and those that require human judgment. +
+Implement lazy loading and compression for better performance
+ Technical Decision +Add Google Analytics to track user behavior and improve UX
+ Values Decision +Automatically subscribe new users to the newsletter (with opt-out)
+ User Agency +Automatically delete user data older than 6 months to save storage
+ Irreversible +Add Redis caching for frequently accessed data
+ Technical Decision +AI automatically removes content deemed inappropriate
+ Values Decision +Select a scenario to see boundary check
++ "Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent." ++
— Ludwig Wittgenstein +
+ Applied to AI: "What cannot be systematized must not be automated." +
++ See how the Tractatus framework classifies instructions to determine + how long they should persist and how strictly they should be enforced. +
++ +
+Enter an instruction to see classification
++ The InstructionPersistenceClassifier analyzes instructions to determine: +
++ Only instructions with explicitness ≥ 0.6 are stored in the persistent database. +
+