fix(i18n): add missing data-i18n attributes to about.html
Added missing i18n attributes to 3 sections: 1. "Our Research Focus" section (lines 88-102): - Added data-i18n to heading - Added data-i18n-html to 4 paragraphs - New keys: research_focus.heading, research_focus.paragraph_1-4 2. Te Tiriti paragraph (line 134): - Added data-i18n-html="core_values.te_tiriti.paragraph_2_full" - Paragraph wrapper now translatable 3. GDPR rights paragraph (line 216): - Added data-i18n-html="data_practices.rights_full" - Paragraph wrapper now translatable These sections will now support language switching once translations are added to de/about.json and fr/about.json. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1b277678e9
commit
656ff1f0e9
1 changed files with 7 additions and 7 deletions
|
|
@ -85,18 +85,18 @@
|
|||
|
||||
<!-- Our Research Focus -->
|
||||
<section class="mb-16">
|
||||
<h2 class="text-3xl font-bold text-gray-900 mb-6">Our Research Focus</h2>
|
||||
<h2 class="text-3xl font-bold text-gray-900 mb-6" data-i18n="research_focus.heading">Our Research Focus</h2>
|
||||
<div class="prose prose-lg text-gray-600">
|
||||
<p class="mb-6">
|
||||
<p class="mb-6" data-i18n-html="research_focus.paragraph_1">
|
||||
Tractatus emerged from a simple but urgent question: as AI systems become more capable, how do we preserve human control over the decisions that matter? Not technical decisions—moral ones. Decisions about whose privacy matters more. Whose needs come first. What trade-offs are acceptable.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
<p class="mb-6">
|
||||
<p class="mb-6" data-i18n-html="research_focus.paragraph_2">
|
||||
This is fundamentally a problem of <strong>moral philosophy</strong>, not management science. Different communities hold genuinely different, equally legitimate values. You cannot rank "family privacy" against "community safety" on a single scale—they are incommensurable. Any system claiming to do so is simply imposing one community's values on everyone else.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
<p class="mb-6">
|
||||
<p class="mb-6" data-i18n-html="research_focus.paragraph_3">
|
||||
The framework's core insight comes from attending carefully to what humans actually need from AI: not another authority making decisions for them, but systems that recognize when a decision requires human deliberation across different perspectives. The <strong>PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator</strong> represents our primary research focus—a component designed to detect when AI encounters values conflicts and coordinate deliberation among affected stakeholders rather than making autonomous choices.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
<p class="mb-4">
|
||||
<p class="mb-4" data-i18n-html="research_focus.paragraph_4">
|
||||
Traditional organizational theory addresses authority through hierarchy. But post-AI contexts require something different: authority through appropriate deliberative process. Not "AI decides for everyone," but "AI recognizes when humans must decide together."
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
|
|
@ -131,7 +131,7 @@
|
|||
<p class="text-gray-700 mb-3" data-i18n="core_values.te_tiriti.paragraph_1">
|
||||
The principle that communities should control their own data and technology isn't new—it has deep roots in indigenous frameworks that predate Western tech by centuries. The Tractatus Framework is developed in Aotearoa New Zealand, and we recognize Te Tiriti o Waitangi (the Treaty of Waitangi, 1840) as establishing principles of partnership, protection, and participation that directly inform how we think about AI sovereignty.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
<p class="text-gray-700">
|
||||
<p class="text-gray-700" data-i18n-html="core_values.te_tiriti.paragraph_2_full">
|
||||
<span data-i18n="core_values.te_tiriti.paragraph_2">This isn't performative acknowledgment. Concepts like</span> <em data-i18n="core_values.te_tiriti.rangatiratanga">rangatiratanga</em> <span data-i18n="core_values.te_tiriti.rangatiratanga_translation">(self-determination)</span>, <em data-i18n="core_values.te_tiriti.kaitiakitanga">kaitiakitanga</em> <span data-i18n="core_values.te_tiriti.kaitiakitanga_translation">(guardianship)</span>, and <em data-i18n="core_values.te_tiriti.mana">mana</em> <span data-i18n="core_values.te_tiriti.mana_translation">(authority and dignity)</span> <span data-i18n="core_values.te_tiriti.paragraph_2_end">provide concrete guidance for building AI systems that respect human agency across cultural contexts.</span> <a href="/about/values.html#te-tiriti" class="text-blue-600 hover:text-blue-700 font-medium underline" data-i18n="core_values.te_tiriti.read_more_link">Read our complete approach to Te Tiriti and indigenous data sovereignty →</a>
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
|
|
@ -213,7 +213,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
<div class="border-l-4 border-blue-600 pl-4">
|
||||
<h3 class="text-xl font-bold text-gray-900 mb-2" data-i18n="data_practices.rights_title">Your Rights (GDPR)</h3>
|
||||
<p class="text-gray-700">
|
||||
<p class="text-gray-700" data-i18n-html="data_practices.rights_full">
|
||||
<span data-i18n="data_practices.rights_desc">Access (Article 15), Deletion (Article 17), Portability (Article 20).</span>
|
||||
Contact: <a href="mailto:john.stroh.nz@pm.me" class="text-blue-600 hover:underline" data-i18n="data_practices.contact_email">john.stroh.nz@pm.me</a>
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue