diff --git a/public/index.html b/public/index.html index 98555e25..dc75e7ab 100644 --- a/public/index.html +++ b/public/index.html @@ -130,9 +130,9 @@

-

Simone Weil — Attention to Affliction

+

Ludwig Wittgenstein — The Limits of the Sayable

- People significantly affected by power imbalances are often unable to articulate their needs. AI governance should attend structurally to the afflicted — not through training data bias correction, but through architectural constraints that reduce the likelihood of harm. + Some decisions can be systematised and delegated to AI; others — involving values, ethics, cultural context — fundamentally cannot. The boundary between the “sayable” (what can be specified, measured, verified) and what lies beyond it is the framework’s foundational constraint. What cannot be systematised must not be automated.

diff --git a/public/timeline.html b/public/timeline.html index 52550c1d..608b7b06 100644 --- a/public/timeline.html +++ b/public/timeline.html @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ Three editions of the research paper "Interrupting Neural Reasoning Through Constitutional Inference Gating" were published: Academic (full formal treatment), Community (practical adoption guide), and Policymakers (regulatory perspective). The Kōrero counter-arguments document was also published — a deliberate engagement with foreseeable criticisms of the approach.

- The papers formalise the philosophical foundations: Isaiah Berlin's value pluralism, Simone Weil's attention to affliction, indigenous data sovereignty from Te Tiriti o Waitangi, and Christopher Alexander's living architecture. + The papers formalise the philosophical foundations: Isaiah Berlin's value pluralism, Wittgenstein's sayable/unsayable distinction, indigenous data sovereignty from Te Tiriti o Waitangi, and Christopher Alexander's living architecture.

Academic →