feat: whitepaper integration + i18n + hero CTA cleanup

- Add Distributive Equity whitepaper to Publications modal (first in Recent Papers)
- Add whitepaper featured card to Research Papers section (homepage)
- i18n: whitepaper card + AI Governance card translations (DE/FR/MI)
- i18n: Research Papers section heading + subtitle translations
- Remove "See It in Production" hero CTA (misleading for research site)
- Sync whitepapers/ directory from server (prevents deletion on next deploy)
- researcher.html: whitepaper as lead section, Alexander demoted
- timeline: April 2026 entry added

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

public/js/components/research-papers-modal.js

@@ -11,6 +11,15 @@ class ResearchPapersModal {
       {
         group: 'Recent Papers',
         items: [
+          {
+            code: 'WP-001',
+            title: 'Distributive Equity Through Structure',
+            subtitle: 'A Community-Scale Worked Example of Values Stickiness',
+            description: 'Documentary case study documenting Village\u2019s Tractatus-framework constitutional architecture as an enactment of values stickiness. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19600614.',
+            date: 'April 2026',
+            status: 'V1.0 \u2014 5 languages',
+            href: '/whitepapers/distributive-equity.html'
+          },
           {
             code: 'STO-RES-0011',
             title: 'Guardian Agents and the Philosophy of AI Accountability',

public/locales/de/homepage.json

@@ -10,13 +10,22 @@
     "card2_desc": "Vier-Phasen-Verifizierung unter Verwendung mathematischer Ähnlichkeit, nicht generativer Prüfung. Konfidenzabzeichen, Analyse auf Anspruchsebene und adaptives Lernen — alles mandantenbezogen.",
     "card3_label": "Fallstudie",
     "card3_title": "Village: Tractatus in der Produktion",
-    "card3_desc": "Der erste Einsatz von konstitutioneller KI-Governance in einer Live-Community-Plattform. Produktionsmetriken, erklärte Einschränkungen und was wir seit Oktober 2025 gelernt haben."
+    "card3_desc": "Der erste Einsatz von konstitutioneller KI-Governance in einer Live-Community-Plattform. Produktionsmetriken, erklärte Einschränkungen und was wir seit Oktober 2025 gelernt haben.",
+    "wp_label": "Arbeitspapier · V1.0",
+    "wp_new": "Neu",
+    "wp_title": "Distributive Equity Through Structure: A Community-Scale Worked Example of Values Stickiness",
+    "wp_desc": "Eine dokumentarische Fallstudie für das juristisch-akademische Forschungsprogramm über Ökosystemmacht. Dokumentiert Village’s Tractatus-Rahmenwerk der verfassungsrechtlichen Architektur als eine Umsetzung der Wertehäftigkeit, die sich auf Wittgenstein, Berlin, Ostrom, Alexander und Te Ao Māori Rahmenwerke der indigenen Datensouveränität stützt.",
+    "wp_footer": "Fünf Sprachen (EN/DE/FR/NL/MI) · CC BY 4.0 · ORCID 0009-0005-2933-7170 →",
+    "ai_label": "Artikelserie",
+    "ai_new": "Neu",
+    "ai_title": "AI-Governance für Gemeinschaften — ein kleinerer Raum als man denkt",
+    "ai_desc": "Wer entscheidet, was KI wird, und mit welcher Befugnis? Philosophie, Philanthropie, Souveränität und praktische Governance — einschließlich der Māori-Rahmenbedingungen für Datensouveränität und Maßnahmen, die der normale Leser ergreifen kann.",
+    "ai_footer": "Fünf Artikel · CC BY 4.0 · mysovereignty.digital →"
   },
   "hero": {
     "title": "Architektonische Governance für KI-Systeme",
     "subtitle": "Einige Entscheidungen erfordern menschliches Urteilsvermögen — architektonisch erzwungen, nicht dem Ermessen einer noch so gut trainierten KI überlassen.",
-    "cta_research": "Lesen Sie die Forschung",
-    "cta_production": "Sehen Sie es in der Produktion"
+    "cta_research": "Lesen Sie die Forschung"
   },
   "problem": {
     "heading": "Das Problem",
@@ -102,8 +111,9 @@
     "leader_cta": "Ressourcen für Führungskräfte anzeigen →"
   },
   "papers": {
-    "heading": "Architektonische Angleichung",
-    "subtitle": "Das Forschungspapier in drei Ausgaben, jede für ein anderes Publikum geschrieben.",
+    "heading": "Forschungspapiere",
+    "subtitle": "Veröffentlichte Forschungsarbeiten aus dem Rahmenprogramm Tractatus.",
+    "wp_desc": "Ein praktisches Beispiel für die Klebigkeit von Werten auf Gemeinschaftsebene. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19600614. Fünf Sprachen. CC BY 4.0.",
     "academic_title": "Akademisch",
     "academic_desc": "Vollständige akademische Behandlung mit formalen Beweisen, existenziellem Risikokontext und umfassenden Zitaten.",
     "community_title": "Gemeinschaft",
@@ -131,7 +141,9 @@
     "date_feb_2026": "Feb 2026",
     "feb_2026": "Souveräne Ausbildung, Forschung über Lenkungsvektoren",
     "date_mar_2026": "Mär 2026",
-    "mar_2026": "Guardian Agents im Einsatz, Beta-Pilotphase eröffnet"
+    "mar_2026": "Guardian Agents im Einsatz, Beta-Pilotphase eröffnet",
+    "date_apr_2026": "Apr 2026",
+    "apr_2026": "Distributive-Equity-Whitepaper — V1.0, DOI, fünf Sprachen, Taiuru-Überprüfung"
   },
   "claims": {
     "heading": "Ein Hinweis zu den Behauptungen",

public/locales/en/homepage.json

@@ -10,13 +10,22 @@
     "card2_desc": "Four-phase verification using mathematical similarity, not generative checking. Confidence badges, claim-level analysis, and adaptive learning — all tenant-scoped.",
     "card3_label": "Case Study",
     "card3_title": "Village: Tractatus in Production",
-    "card3_desc": "The first deployment of constitutional AI governance in a live community platform. Production metrics, stated limitations, and what we have learned since October 2025."
+    "card3_desc": "The first deployment of constitutional AI governance in a live community platform. Production metrics, stated limitations, and what we have learned since October 2025.",
+    "wp_label": "Working Paper · V1.0",
+    "wp_new": "New",
+    "wp_title": "Distributive Equity Through Structure: A Community-Scale Worked Example of Values Stickiness",
+    "wp_desc": "A documentary case study offered to the legal-academic research programme on ecosystem power. Documents Village’s Tractatus-framework constitutional architecture as an enactment of values stickiness, grounded in Wittgenstein, Berlin, Ostrom, Alexander, and Te Ao Māori frameworks of indigenous data sovereignty.",
+    "wp_footer": "Five languages (EN/DE/FR/NL/MI) · CC BY 4.0 · ORCID 0009-0005-2933-7170 →",
+    "ai_label": "Article Series",
+    "ai_new": "New",
+    "ai_title": "AI Governance for Communities — A Smaller Room Than You Think",
+    "ai_desc": "Who decides what AI becomes, and by what authority? Philosophy, philanthropy, sovereignty, and practical governance — including Māori frameworks for data sovereignty and what action ordinary readers can take.",
+    "ai_footer": "Five articles · CC BY 4.0 · mysovereignty.digital →"
   },
   "hero": {
     "title": "Architectural Governance for AI Systems",
     "subtitle": "Some decisions require human judgment — architecturally enforced, not left to AI discretion, however well trained.",
-    "cta_research": "Read the Research",
-    "cta_production": "See It in Production"
+    "cta_research": "Read the Research"
   },
   "problem": {
     "heading": "The Problem",
@@ -102,8 +111,9 @@
     "leader_cta": "View leadership resources →"
   },
   "papers": {
-    "heading": "Architectural Alignment",
-    "subtitle": "The research paper in three editions, each written for a different audience.",
+    "heading": "Research Papers",
+    "subtitle": "Published research from the Tractatus framework programme.",
+    "wp_desc": "A community-scale worked example of values stickiness. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19600614. Five languages. CC BY 4.0.",
     "academic_title": "Academic",
     "academic_desc": "Full academic treatment with formal proofs, existential risk context, and comprehensive citations.",
     "community_title": "Community",
@@ -131,7 +141,9 @@
     "date_feb_2026": "Feb 2026",
     "feb_2026": "Sovereign training, steering vectors research",
     "date_mar_2026": "Mar 2026",
-    "mar_2026": "Guardian Agents deployed, beta pilot open"
+    "mar_2026": "Guardian Agents deployed, beta pilot open",
+    "date_apr_2026": "Apr 2026",
+    "apr_2026": "Distributive Equity whitepaper — V1.0, DOI, five languages, Taiuru review"
   },
   "claims": {
     "heading": "A note on claims",

public/locales/fr/homepage.json

@@ -10,13 +10,22 @@
     "card2_desc": "Vérification en quatre phases utilisant la similarité mathématique, et non la vérification générative. Badges de confiance, analyse au niveau des revendications et apprentissage adaptatif — le tout au niveau du locataire.",
     "card3_label": "Étude de cas",
     "card3_title": "Village : Tractatus en production",
-    "card3_desc": "Le premier déploiement de la gouvernance constitutionnelle de l’IA dans une plateforme communautaire en direct. Métriques de production, limites énoncées et ce que nous avons appris depuis octobre 2025."
+    "card3_desc": "Le premier déploiement de la gouvernance constitutionnelle de l’IA dans une plateforme communautaire en direct. Métriques de production, limites énoncées et ce que nous avons appris depuis octobre 2025.",
+    "wp_label": "Document de travail · V1.0",
+    "wp_new": "Nouveau",
+    "wp_title": "Distributive Equity Through Structure: A Community-Scale Worked Example of Values Stickiness",
+    "wp_desc": "Une étude de cas documentaire offerte au programme de recherche juridique-académique sur le pouvoir de l’écosystème. Documente l’architecture constitutionnelle du cadre du Tractatus de Village en tant que mise en œuvre de l’adhérence des valeurs, fondée sur Wittgenstein, Berlin, Ostrom, Alexander, et les cadres Te Ao Māori de la souveraineté des données indigènes.",
+    "wp_footer": "Cinq langues (EN/DE/FR/NL/MI) · CC BY 4.0 · ORCID 0009-0005-2933-7170 →",
+    "ai_label": "Série d’articles",
+    "ai_new": "Nouveau",
+    "ai_title": "Gouvernance de l’IA pour les collectivités — Un espace plus restreint qu’on ne le pense",
+    "ai_desc": "Qui décide de ce que devient l’IA, et par quelle autorité ? Philosophie, philanthropie, souveraineté et gouvernance pratique — y compris les cadres Māori pour la souveraineté des données et les mesures que les lecteurs ordinaires peuvent prendre.",
+    "ai_footer": "Cinq articles · CC BY 4.0 · mysovereignty.digital →"
   },
   "hero": {
     "title": "Gouvernance architecturale pour les systèmes d’IA",
     "subtitle": "Certaines décisions requièrent un jugement humain — imposé par l’architecture, et non laissé à l’appréciation de l’IA, aussi bien formée soit-elle.",
-    "cta_research": "Lire la recherche",
-    "cta_production": "Le voir en production"
+    "cta_research": "Lire la recherche"
   },
   "problem": {
     "heading": "Le problème",
@@ -102,8 +111,9 @@
     "leader_cta": "Voir les ressources de leadership →"
   },
   "papers": {
-    "heading": "Alignement architectural",
-    "subtitle": "Le document de recherche existe en trois éditions, chacune destinée à un public différent.",
+    "heading": "Documents de recherche",
+    "subtitle": "Recherche publiée dans le cadre du programme-cadre Tractatus.",
+    "wp_desc": "Un exemple concret à l’échelle de la communauté de l’adhésion aux valeurs. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19600614. Cinq langues. CC BY 4.0.",
     "academic_title": "Universitaire",
     "academic_desc": "Traitement académique complet avec des preuves formelles, un contexte de risque existentiel et des citations complètes.",
     "community_title": "Communauté",
@@ -131,7 +141,9 @@
     "date_feb_2026": "Fév 2026",
     "feb_2026": "Formation à la souveraineté, recherche de vecteurs de direction",
     "date_mar_2026": "Mars 2026",
-    "mar_2026": "Déploiement des Guardian Agents, ouverture du pilote bêta"
+    "mar_2026": "Déploiement des Guardian Agents, ouverture du pilote bêta",
+    "date_apr_2026": "Avr 2026",
+    "apr_2026": "Livre blanc Distributive Equity — V1.0, DOI, cinq langues, révision Taiuru"
   },
   "claims": {
     "heading": "Une note sur les affirmations",

public/locales/mi/homepage.json

@@ -10,13 +10,22 @@
     "card2_desc": "Whakamana i ngā wāhanga e whā mā te whakamahi i te ōritetanga pāngarau, ehara i te tirotiro whakaputa. Ngā tohu whakawhirinaki, tātaritanga taumata kerēme, me te ako urutau — katoa e hāngai ana ki ngā kaipā.",
     "card3_label": "Tātaritanga Take",
     "card3_title": "Village: Tractatus kei te whakaputanga",
-    "card3_desc": "Ko te whakaurunga tuatahi o te whakahaere AI ā-ture i roto i tētahi papanga hapori ora. Ngā ine whakaputa, ngā here kua whakatauhia, me ngā mea kua akohia e mātou mai i te Oketopa 2025."
+    "card3_desc": "Ko te whakaurunga tuatahi o te whakahaere AI ā-ture i roto i tētahi papanga hapori ora. Ngā ine whakaputa, ngā here kua whakatauhia, me ngā mea kua akohia e mātou mai i te Oketopa 2025.",
+    "wp_label": "Pepa Mahi · V1.0",
+    "wp_new": "Hōu",
+    "wp_title": "Distributive Equity Through Structure: A Community-Scale Worked Example of Values Stickiness",
+    "wp_desc": "He rangahau take tuhipoka i tukuna ki te hōtaka rangahau ā-ture mātauranga mō te mana pūnaha taiao. E whakaatu ana i te hanganga ture matua o te anga Tractatus o Village hei whakatinanatanga o te piri o ngā uara, e ū ana ki ngā anga a Wittgenstein, Berlin, Ostrom, Alexander, me Te Ao Māori mō te rangatiratanga raraunga taketake.",
+    "wp_footer": "Ngā reo e rima (EN/DE/FR/NL/MI) · CC BY 4.0 · ORCID 0009-0005-2933-7170 →",
+    "ai_label": "Raupapa Tuhinga",
+    "ai_new": "Hōu",
+    "ai_title": "Te Whakahaere AI mō ngā Hapori — He rūma iti iho i tō whakaaro",
+    "ai_desc": "Ko wai e whakatau ana he aha ka puta ake i te AI, ā, mā he aha te mana? Te ariā, te aroha tangata, te rangatiratanga, me te whakahaere whaihua — tae atu ki ngā anga Māori mō te rangatiratanga raraunga me ngā mahi ka taea e ngā kaipānui noa.",
+    "ai_footer": "Ngā tuhinga e rima · CC BY 4.0 · mysovereignty.digital →"
   },
   "hero": {
     "title": "Te Whakahaere Hanga mō ngā Pūnaha AI",
     "subtitle": "Ko ētahi whakatau me whai te whakaaro tangata — kua whakaaetia ā-hanga, ehara i te mea ka waiho mā te AI, ahakoa tōna matatau.",
-    "cta_research": "Pānuitia te Rangahau",
-    "cta_production": "Tirohia te Whakamahinga"
+    "cta_research": "Pānuitia te Rangahau"
   },
   "problem": {
     "heading": "Te Raruraru",
@@ -102,8 +111,9 @@
     "leader_cta": "Tirohia ngā rauemi kaihautū →"
   },
   "papers": {
-    "heading": "Te Hāngaitanga ā-Hanga",
-    "subtitle": "Te pepa rangahau i ngā putanga e toru, ia putanga mō tētahi hunga kē.",
+    "heading": "Ngā Puka Rangahau",
+    "subtitle": "Ngā rangahau kua whakaputaina mai i te hōtaka anga Tractatus.",
+    "wp_desc": "He tauira mahi ā-hapori mō te ū tonu o ngā uara. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19600614. Rima ngā reo. CC BY 4.0.",
     "academic_title": "Akoranga",
     "academic_desc": "Te whakaritenga akoranga katoa me ngā whakatūturu ā-tikanga, te horopaki tūraru oranga, me ngā tohutoro whānui.",
     "community_title": "Hapori",
@@ -131,7 +141,9 @@
     "date_feb_2026": "Hui 2026",
     "feb_2026": "Tautuhi rangatira, rangahau aronga whakahaere",
     "date_mar_2026": "Pou 2026",
-    "mar_2026": "Kua whakarewahia ngā Guardian Agents, kua tuwhera te whakamātautau beta"
+    "mar_2026": "Kua whakarewahia ngā Guardian Agents, kua tuwhera te whakamātautau beta",
+    "date_apr_2026": "Apr 2026",
+    "apr_2026": "Pepa Distributive Equity — V1.0, DOI, ngā reo e rima, arotake Taiuru"
   },
   "claims": {
     "heading": "He kupu mō ngā kerēme",