feat(i18n): add interactive diagram modal translations for EN/DE/FR
- Added diagram_services section to all three language JSON files - Modified interactive-diagram.js to load translations from i18n system - Added language change event listeners to update modals dynamically - Removed hardcoded English serviceData from JavaScript - Modals now fully translate when language is switched
This commit is contained in:
TheFlow
parent
e0bea7c893
commit
25fccdde4b
4 changed files with 325 additions and 199 deletions
|
|
@ -8,211 +8,55 @@
|
|||
|
||||
class InteractiveDiagram {
|
||||
constructor() {
|
||||
this.serviceData = {
|
||||
overview: {
|
||||
name: 'Tractatus Governance Layer',
|
||||
shortName: 'Overview',
|
||||
color: '#0ea5e9',
|
||||
icon: '⚙️',
|
||||
description: 'Six external governance services working together to enforce AI safety boundaries outside the AI runtime.',
|
||||
details: [
|
||||
'All services operate externally to the AI—making manipulation harder',
|
||||
'Instruction storage and validation work together to prevent directive fade',
|
||||
'Boundary enforcement and deliberation coordinate on values decisions',
|
||||
'Pressure monitoring adjusts verification requirements dynamically',
|
||||
'Metacognitive gates ensure AI pauses before high-risk operations',
|
||||
'Each service addresses a different failure mode in AI safety'
|
||||
],
|
||||
promise: 'External architectural enforcement that is structurally more difficult to bypass than behavioral training alone.'
|
||||
},
|
||||
boundary: {
|
||||
name: 'BoundaryEnforcer',
|
||||
shortName: 'Boundary',
|
||||
color: '#10b981',
|
||||
icon: '🔒',
|
||||
description: 'Blocks AI from making values decisions (privacy, ethics, strategic direction). Requires human approval.',
|
||||
details: [
|
||||
'Enforces Tractatus 12.1-12.7 boundaries',
|
||||
'Values decisions architecturally require humans',
|
||||
'Prevents AI autonomous decision-making on ethical questions',
|
||||
'External enforcement - harder to bypass via prompting'
|
||||
],
|
||||
promise: 'Values boundaries enforced externally—harder to manipulate through prompting.'
|
||||
},
|
||||
instruction: {
|
||||
name: 'InstructionPersistenceClassifier',
|
||||
shortName: 'Instruction',
|
||||
color: '#6366f1',
|
||||
icon: '📋',
|
||||
description: 'Stores instructions externally with persistence levels (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW). Aims to reduce directive fade.',
|
||||
details: [
|
||||
'Quadrant-based classification (STR/OPS/TAC/SYS/STO)',
|
||||
'Time-persistence metadata tagging',
|
||||
'Temporal horizon modeling (STRATEGIC, OPERATIONAL, TACTICAL)',
|
||||
'External storage independent of AI runtime'
|
||||
],
|
||||
promise: 'Instructions stored outside AI—more resistant to context manipulation.'
|
||||
},
|
||||
validator: {
|
||||
name: 'CrossReferenceValidator',
|
||||
shortName: 'Validator',
|
||||
color: '#8b5cf6',
|
||||
icon: '✓',
|
||||
description: 'Validates AI actions against instruction history. Aims to prevent pattern bias overriding explicit directives.',
|
||||
details: [
|
||||
'Cross-references AI claims with external instruction history',
|
||||
'Detects pattern-based overrides of explicit user directives',
|
||||
'Independent verification layer',
|
||||
'Helps prevent instruction drift'
|
||||
],
|
||||
promise: 'Independent verification—AI claims checked against external source.'
|
||||
},
|
||||
pressure: {
|
||||
name: 'ContextPressureMonitor',
|
||||
shortName: 'Pressure',
|
||||
color: '#f59e0b',
|
||||
icon: '⚡',
|
||||
description: 'Monitors AI performance degradation. Escalates when context pressure threatens quality.',
|
||||
details: [
|
||||
'Tracks token usage, complexity, error rates',
|
||||
'Detects degraded operating conditions',
|
||||
'Adjusts verification requirements under pressure',
|
||||
'Objective metrics for quality monitoring'
|
||||
],
|
||||
promise: 'Objective metrics may detect manipulation attempts early.'
|
||||
},
|
||||
metacognitive: {
|
||||
name: 'MetacognitiveVerifier',
|
||||
shortName: 'Metacognitive',
|
||||
color: '#ec4899',
|
||||
icon: '💡',
|
||||
description: 'Requires AI to pause and verify complex operations before execution. Structural safety check.',
|
||||
details: [
|
||||
'AI self-checks alignment, coherence, safety before execution',
|
||||
'Structural pause-and-verify gates',
|
||||
'Selective verification (not constant)',
|
||||
'Architectural enforcement of reflection steps'
|
||||
],
|
||||
promise: 'Architectural gates aim to enforce verification steps.'
|
||||
},
|
||||
deliberation: {
|
||||
name: 'PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator',
|
||||
shortName: 'Deliberation',
|
||||
color: '#14b8a6',
|
||||
icon: '👥',
|
||||
description: 'Facilitates multi-stakeholder deliberation for values conflicts where no single "correct" answer exists.',
|
||||
details: [
|
||||
'Non-hierarchical coordination for values conflicts',
|
||||
'Stakeholder perspective representation',
|
||||
'Consensus-building for ethical trade-offs',
|
||||
'Addresses values pluralism in AI safety'
|
||||
],
|
||||
promise: 'Facilitates deliberation across stakeholder perspectives for values conflicts.'
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
this.activeService = null;
|
||||
this.loadTranslations();
|
||||
this.init();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
init() {
|
||||
if (document.readyState === 'loading') {
|
||||
document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', () => this.setup());
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
this.setup();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
console.log('[InteractiveDiagram] Initialized');
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
setup() {
|
||||
// SVG is loaded via <object> tag, need to access its contentDocument
|
||||
const objectElement = document.getElementById('interactive-svg-object');
|
||||
if (!objectElement) {
|
||||
console.warn('[InteractiveDiagram] SVG object element not found');
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Wait for object to load with retry mechanism
|
||||
const initializeSVG = () => {
|
||||
const svgDoc = objectElement.contentDocument;
|
||||
if (!svgDoc) {
|
||||
console.warn('[InteractiveDiagram] Could not access SVG contentDocument, retrying...');
|
||||
setTimeout(initializeSVG, 100);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// The SVG is the document element itself, or we can query for it
|
||||
let svg = svgDoc.getElementById('interactive-arch-diagram');
|
||||
if (!svg) {
|
||||
// Try getting the root SVG element
|
||||
svg = svgDoc.documentElement;
|
||||
console.log('[InteractiveDiagram] Using documentElement as SVG');
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!svg) {
|
||||
console.warn('[InteractiveDiagram] SVG diagram not found in contentDocument');
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Verify it's actually an SVG element (case-insensitive check)
|
||||
const tagName = svg.tagName ? svg.tagName.toLowerCase() : '';
|
||||
if (tagName !== 'svg') {
|
||||
console.warn('[InteractiveDiagram] Element found but not SVG, tagName:', tagName, '- retrying...');
|
||||
// This is the race condition - contentDocument is HTML, not SVG yet
|
||||
setTimeout(initializeSVG, 100);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Store reference to SVG document for later use
|
||||
this.svgDoc = svgDoc;
|
||||
this.svg = svg;
|
||||
|
||||
const nodes = svg.querySelectorAll('.service-node');
|
||||
console.log(`[InteractiveDiagram] Found ${nodes.length} service nodes`);
|
||||
|
||||
if (nodes.length === 0) {
|
||||
console.warn('[InteractiveDiagram] No service nodes found in SVG');
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
nodes.forEach(node => {
|
||||
const serviceId = node.getAttribute('data-service');
|
||||
|
||||
// Click handler
|
||||
node.addEventListener('click', (e) => {
|
||||
e.preventDefault();
|
||||
e.stopPropagation();
|
||||
this.showServiceDetails(serviceId);
|
||||
}, true);
|
||||
|
||||
// Touch support for mobile devices
|
||||
node.addEventListener('touchstart', (e) => {
|
||||
e.preventDefault();
|
||||
const serviceId = node.getAttribute('data-service');
|
||||
this.showServiceDetails(serviceId);
|
||||
}, { passive: false });
|
||||
|
||||
// Hover effects
|
||||
node.addEventListener('mouseenter', () => {
|
||||
this.highlightService(serviceId);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
node.addEventListener('mouseleave', () => {
|
||||
this.unhighlightService(serviceId);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Add pointer cursor via JavaScript (CSP-compliant)
|
||||
node.style.cursor = 'pointer';
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
this.addKeyboardNavigation(nodes);
|
||||
|
||||
// Show initial state (overview)
|
||||
this.showServiceDetails('overview');
|
||||
console.log('[InteractiveDiagram] Setup complete, showing overview');
|
||||
loadTranslations() {
|
||||
// Get translations from i18n system
|
||||
const i18n = window.i18nTranslations || {};
|
||||
const diagram = i18n.diagram_services || {};
|
||||
|
||||
// Define static properties (icons and colors)
|
||||
const staticProps = {
|
||||
overview: { color: '#0ea5e9', icon: '⚙️' },
|
||||
boundary: { color: '#10b981', icon: '🔒' },
|
||||
instruction: { color: '#6366f1', icon: '📋' },
|
||||
validator: { color: '#8b5cf6', icon: '✓' },
|
||||
pressure: { color: '#f59e0b', icon: '⚡' },
|
||||
metacognitive: { color: '#ec4899', icon: '💡' },
|
||||
deliberation: { color: '#14b8a6', icon: '👥' }
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// Build serviceData from translations
|
||||
this.serviceData = {};
|
||||
|
||||
Object.keys(staticProps).forEach(serviceId => {
|
||||
const trans = diagram[serviceId] || {};
|
||||
const details = [];
|
||||
|
||||
// Collect detail1-detail6 (some services have 4, overview has 6)
|
||||
for (let i = 1; i <= 6; i++) {
|
||||
if (trans[`detail${i}`]) {
|
||||
details.push(trans[`detail${i}`]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
this.serviceData[serviceId] = {
|
||||
name: trans.name || serviceId,
|
||||
shortName: trans.shortName || serviceId,
|
||||
color: staticProps[serviceId].color,
|
||||
icon: staticProps[serviceId].icon,
|
||||
description: trans.description || '',
|
||||
details: details,
|
||||
promise: trans.promise || ''
|
||||
};
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
console.log('[InteractiveDiagram] Loaded translations for', Object.keys(this.serviceData).length, 'services');
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// FIXED: Better load detection with SVG verification
|
||||
const checkAndInit = () => {
|
||||
const svgDoc = objectElement.contentDocument;
|
||||
|
|
@ -423,6 +267,66 @@ if (typeof window !== 'undefined') {
|
|||
window.interactiveDiagram = new InteractiveDiagram();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (typeof module !== 'undefined' && module.exports) {
|
||||
module.exports = InteractiveDiagram;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Listen for language changes and reload translations
|
||||
handleLanguageChange() {
|
||||
console.log('[InteractiveDiagram] Language changed, reloading translations');
|
||||
this.loadTranslations();
|
||||
// Re-render current service if one is active
|
||||
if (this.activeService) {
|
||||
const service = this.serviceData[this.activeService];
|
||||
if (service) {
|
||||
this.renderServicePanel(service);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Initialize and listen for language changes
|
||||
if (typeof window !== 'undefined') {
|
||||
window.interactiveDiagram = new InteractiveDiagram();
|
||||
|
||||
// Listen for i18n initialization and language changes
|
||||
window.addEventListener('i18nInitialized', () => {
|
||||
if (window.interactiveDiagram) {
|
||||
window.interactiveDiagram.handleLanguageChange();
|
||||
|
||||
// Listen for language changes and reload translations
|
||||
handleLanguageChange() {
|
||||
console.log('[InteractiveDiagram] Language changed, reloading translations');
|
||||
this.loadTranslations();
|
||||
// Re-render current service if one is active
|
||||
if (this.activeService) {
|
||||
const service = this.serviceData[this.activeService];
|
||||
if (service) {
|
||||
this.renderServicePanel(service);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Initialize and listen for language changes
|
||||
if (typeof window !== 'undefined') {
|
||||
window.interactiveDiagram = new InteractiveDiagram();
|
||||
|
||||
// Listen for i18n initialization
|
||||
window.addEventListener('i18nInitialized', () => {
|
||||
if (window.interactiveDiagram) {
|
||||
window.interactiveDiagram.handleLanguageChange();
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Listen for language changes
|
||||
window.addEventListener('languageChanged', () => {
|
||||
if (window.interactiveDiagram) {
|
||||
window.interactiveDiagram.handleLanguageChange();
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (typeof module !== 'undefined' && module.exports) {
|
||||
module.exports = InteractiveDiagram;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -127,5 +127,79 @@
|
|||
"btn_docs": "Dokumentation Lesen",
|
||||
"btn_research": "Forschung Ansehen",
|
||||
"btn_implementation": "Implementierungsleitfaden"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagram_services": {
|
||||
"overview": {
|
||||
"name": "Tractatus Governance-Ebene",
|
||||
"shortName": "Übersicht",
|
||||
"description": "Sechs externe Governance-Dienste arbeiten zusammen, um KI-Sicherheitsgrenzen außerhalb der KI-Laufzeit durchzusetzen.",
|
||||
"detail1": "Alle Dienste operieren extern zur KI – Manipulation wird erschwert",
|
||||
"detail2": "Anweisungsspeicherung und Validierung arbeiten zusammen, um Direktiven-Verfall zu verhindern",
|
||||
"detail3": "Grenzdurchsetzung und Beratung koordinieren Werteentscheidungen",
|
||||
"detail4": "Drucküberwachung passt Verifikationsanforderungen dynamisch an",
|
||||
"detail5": "Metakognitive Gates stellen sicher, dass KI vor risikoreichen Operationen pausiert",
|
||||
"detail6": "Jeder Dienst adressiert einen anderen Fehlermodus in der KI-Sicherheit",
|
||||
"promise": "Externe architektonische Durchsetzung, die strukturell schwieriger zu umgehen ist als verhaltensbasiertes Training allein."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"boundary": {
|
||||
"name": "BoundaryEnforcer",
|
||||
"shortName": "Grenze",
|
||||
"description": "Blockiert die KI daran, Werteentscheidungen zu treffen (Datenschutz, Ethik, strategische Ausrichtung). Erfordert menschliche Genehmigung.",
|
||||
"detail1": "Erzwingt Tractatus 12.1-12.7 Grenzen",
|
||||
"detail2": "Werteentscheidungen erfordern architektonisch Menschen",
|
||||
"detail3": "Verhindert autonome KI-Entscheidungen bei ethischen Fragen",
|
||||
"detail4": "Externe Durchsetzung - schwieriger durch Prompting zu umgehen",
|
||||
"promise": "Wertegrenzen extern durchgesetzt – schwieriger durch Prompting zu manipulieren."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"instruction": {
|
||||
"name": "InstructionPersistenceClassifier",
|
||||
"shortName": "Anweisung",
|
||||
"description": "Speichert Anweisungen extern mit Persistenzstufen (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW). Zielt darauf ab, Direktiven-Verfall zu reduzieren.",
|
||||
"detail1": "Quadrantenbasierte Klassifikation (STR/OPS/TAC/SYS/STO)",
|
||||
"detail2": "Zeitpersistenz-Metadaten-Tagging",
|
||||
"detail3": "Temporale Horizont-Modellierung (STRATEGIC, OPERATIONAL, TACTICAL)",
|
||||
"detail4": "Externe Speicherung unabhängig von der KI-Laufzeit",
|
||||
"promise": "Anweisungen außerhalb der KI gespeichert – widerstandsfähiger gegen Kontextmanipulation."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"validator": {
|
||||
"name": "CrossReferenceValidator",
|
||||
"shortName": "Validator",
|
||||
"description": "Validiert KI-Aktionen gegen Anweisungshistorie. Zielt darauf ab, Musterbias-Überschreibung expliziter Direktiven zu verhindern.",
|
||||
"detail1": "Gleicht KI-Behauptungen mit externer Anweisungshistorie ab",
|
||||
"detail2": "Erkennt musterbasierte Überschreibungen expliziter Benutzerdirektiven",
|
||||
"detail3": "Unabhängige Verifikationsebene",
|
||||
"detail4": "Hilft, Anweisungsdrift zu verhindern",
|
||||
"promise": "Unabhängige Verifikation – KI-Behauptungen gegen externe Quelle geprüft."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"pressure": {
|
||||
"name": "ContextPressureMonitor",
|
||||
"shortName": "Druck",
|
||||
"description": "Überwacht KI-Leistungsverschlechterung. Eskaliert, wenn Kontextdruck die Qualität bedroht.",
|
||||
"detail1": "Verfolgt Token-Nutzung, Komplexität, Fehlerraten",
|
||||
"detail2": "Erkennt degradierte Betriebsbedingungen",
|
||||
"detail3": "Passt Verifikationsanforderungen unter Druck an",
|
||||
"detail4": "Objektive Metriken zur Qualitätsüberwachung",
|
||||
"promise": "Objektive Metriken können Manipulationsversuche frühzeitig erkennen."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"metacognitive": {
|
||||
"name": "MetacognitiveVerifier",
|
||||
"shortName": "Metakognitiv",
|
||||
"description": "Erfordert, dass die KI pausiert und komplexe Operationen vor der Ausführung überprüft. Strukturelle Sicherheitsprüfung.",
|
||||
"detail1": "KI überprüft Ausrichtung, Kohärenz, Sicherheit vor Ausführung selbst",
|
||||
"detail2": "Strukturelle Pause-und-Verifikations-Gates",
|
||||
"detail3": "Selektive Verifikation (nicht konstant)",
|
||||
"detail4": "Architektonische Durchsetzung von Reflexionsschritten",
|
||||
"promise": "Architektonische Gates zielen darauf ab, Verifikationsschritte durchzusetzen."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"deliberation": {
|
||||
"name": "PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator",
|
||||
"shortName": "Beratung",
|
||||
"description": "Erleichtert Multi-Stakeholder-Beratung bei Wertekonflikten, bei denen keine einzelne \"richtige\" Antwort existiert.",
|
||||
"detail1": "Nicht-hierarchische Koordination bei Wertekonflikten",
|
||||
"detail2": "Repräsentation von Stakeholder-Perspektiven",
|
||||
"detail3": "Konsensbildung für ethische Abwägungen",
|
||||
"detail4": "Adressiert Wertepluralismus in der KI-Sicherheit",
|
||||
"promise": "Erleichtert Beratung über Stakeholder-Perspektiven hinweg bei Wertekonflikten."
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -127,5 +127,79 @@
|
|||
"btn_docs": "Read Documentation",
|
||||
"btn_research": "View Research",
|
||||
"btn_implementation": "Implementation Guide"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagram_services": {
|
||||
"overview": {
|
||||
"name": "Tractatus Governance Layer",
|
||||
"shortName": "Overview",
|
||||
"description": "Six external governance services working together to enforce AI safety boundaries outside the AI runtime.",
|
||||
"detail1": "All services operate externally to the AI—making manipulation harder",
|
||||
"detail2": "Instruction storage and validation work together to prevent directive fade",
|
||||
"detail3": "Boundary enforcement and deliberation coordinate on values decisions",
|
||||
"detail4": "Pressure monitoring adjusts verification requirements dynamically",
|
||||
"detail5": "Metacognitive gates ensure AI pauses before high-risk operations",
|
||||
"detail6": "Each service addresses a different failure mode in AI safety",
|
||||
"promise": "External architectural enforcement that is structurally more difficult to bypass than behavioral training alone."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"boundary": {
|
||||
"name": "BoundaryEnforcer",
|
||||
"shortName": "Boundary",
|
||||
"description": "Blocks AI from making values decisions (privacy, ethics, strategic direction). Requires human approval.",
|
||||
"detail1": "Enforces Tractatus 12.1-12.7 boundaries",
|
||||
"detail2": "Values decisions architecturally require humans",
|
||||
"detail3": "Prevents AI autonomous decision-making on ethical questions",
|
||||
"detail4": "External enforcement - harder to bypass via prompting",
|
||||
"promise": "Values boundaries enforced externally—harder to manipulate through prompting."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"instruction": {
|
||||
"name": "InstructionPersistenceClassifier",
|
||||
"shortName": "Instruction",
|
||||
"description": "Stores instructions externally with persistence levels (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW). Aims to reduce directive fade.",
|
||||
"detail1": "Quadrant-based classification (STR/OPS/TAC/SYS/STO)",
|
||||
"detail2": "Time-persistence metadata tagging",
|
||||
"detail3": "Temporal horizon modeling (STRATEGIC, OPERATIONAL, TACTICAL)",
|
||||
"detail4": "External storage independent of AI runtime",
|
||||
"promise": "Instructions stored outside AI—more resistant to context manipulation."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"validator": {
|
||||
"name": "CrossReferenceValidator",
|
||||
"shortName": "Validator",
|
||||
"description": "Validates AI actions against instruction history. Aims to prevent pattern bias overriding explicit directives.",
|
||||
"detail1": "Cross-references AI claims with external instruction history",
|
||||
"detail2": "Detects pattern-based overrides of explicit user directives",
|
||||
"detail3": "Independent verification layer",
|
||||
"detail4": "Helps prevent instruction drift",
|
||||
"promise": "Independent verification—AI claims checked against external source."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"pressure": {
|
||||
"name": "ContextPressureMonitor",
|
||||
"shortName": "Pressure",
|
||||
"description": "Monitors AI performance degradation. Escalates when context pressure threatens quality.",
|
||||
"detail1": "Tracks token usage, complexity, error rates",
|
||||
"detail2": "Detects degraded operating conditions",
|
||||
"detail3": "Adjusts verification requirements under pressure",
|
||||
"detail4": "Objective metrics for quality monitoring",
|
||||
"promise": "Objective metrics may detect manipulation attempts early."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"metacognitive": {
|
||||
"name": "MetacognitiveVerifier",
|
||||
"shortName": "Metacognitive",
|
||||
"description": "Requires AI to pause and verify complex operations before execution. Structural safety check.",
|
||||
"detail1": "AI self-checks alignment, coherence, safety before execution",
|
||||
"detail2": "Structural pause-and-verify gates",
|
||||
"detail3": "Selective verification (not constant)",
|
||||
"detail4": "Architectural enforcement of reflection steps",
|
||||
"promise": "Architectural gates aim to enforce verification steps."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"deliberation": {
|
||||
"name": "PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator",
|
||||
"shortName": "Deliberation",
|
||||
"description": "Facilitates multi-stakeholder deliberation for values conflicts where no single \"correct\" answer exists.",
|
||||
"detail1": "Non-hierarchical coordination for values conflicts",
|
||||
"detail2": "Stakeholder perspective representation",
|
||||
"detail3": "Consensus-building for ethical trade-offs",
|
||||
"detail4": "Addresses values pluralism in AI safety",
|
||||
"promise": "Facilitates deliberation across stakeholder perspectives for values conflicts."
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -127,5 +127,79 @@
|
|||
"btn_docs": "Lire la Documentation",
|
||||
"btn_research": "Voir la Recherche",
|
||||
"btn_implementation": "Guide d'Implémentation"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"diagram_services": {
|
||||
"overview": {
|
||||
"name": "Couche de Gouvernance Tractatus",
|
||||
"shortName": "Aperçu",
|
||||
"description": "Six services de gouvernance externes travaillant ensemble pour appliquer les limites de sécurité de l'IA en dehors du runtime de l'IA.",
|
||||
"detail1": "Tous les services opèrent en externe à l'IA – rendant la manipulation plus difficile",
|
||||
"detail2": "Le stockage des instructions et la validation travaillent ensemble pour prévenir l'effacement des directives",
|
||||
"detail3": "L'application des frontières et la délibération coordonnent les décisions de valeurs",
|
||||
"detail4": "La surveillance de la pression ajuste les exigences de vérification de manière dynamique",
|
||||
"detail5": "Les portes métacognitives assurent que l'IA marque une pause avant les opérations à haut risque",
|
||||
"detail6": "Chaque service adresse un mode de défaillance différent dans la sécurité de l'IA",
|
||||
"promise": "Application architecturale externe structurellement plus difficile à contourner que la formation comportementale seule."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"boundary": {
|
||||
"name": "BoundaryEnforcer",
|
||||
"shortName": "Frontière",
|
||||
"description": "Empêche l'IA de prendre des décisions de valeurs (confidentialité, éthique, direction stratégique). Nécessite l'approbation humaine.",
|
||||
"detail1": "Applique les limites Tractatus 12.1-12.7",
|
||||
"detail2": "Les décisions de valeurs nécessitent architecturalement des humains",
|
||||
"detail3": "Empêche la prise de décision autonome de l'IA sur les questions éthiques",
|
||||
"detail4": "Application externe - plus difficile à contourner via prompting",
|
||||
"promise": "Frontières de valeurs appliquées en externe – plus difficile à manipuler par prompting."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"instruction": {
|
||||
"name": "InstructionPersistenceClassifier",
|
||||
"shortName": "Instruction",
|
||||
"description": "Stocke les instructions en externe avec des niveaux de persistance (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW). Vise à réduire l'effacement des directives.",
|
||||
"detail1": "Classification basée sur les quadrants (STR/OPS/TAC/SYS/STO)",
|
||||
"detail2": "Étiquetage de métadonnées de persistance temporelle",
|
||||
"detail3": "Modélisation d'horizon temporel (STRATEGIC, OPERATIONAL, TACTICAL)",
|
||||
"detail4": "Stockage externe indépendant du runtime de l'IA",
|
||||
"promise": "Instructions stockées en dehors de l'IA – plus résistantes à la manipulation contextuelle."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"validator": {
|
||||
"name": "CrossReferenceValidator",
|
||||
"shortName": "Validateur",
|
||||
"description": "Valide les actions de l'IA contre l'historique des instructions. Vise à empêcher le biais de pattern de remplacer les directives explicites.",
|
||||
"detail1": "Vérifie les affirmations de l'IA avec l'historique des instructions externe",
|
||||
"detail2": "Détecte les remplacements basés sur les patterns des directives utilisateur explicites",
|
||||
"detail3": "Couche de vérification indépendante",
|
||||
"detail4": "Aide à prévenir la dérive des instructions",
|
||||
"promise": "Vérification indépendante – affirmations de l'IA vérifiées contre une source externe."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"pressure": {
|
||||
"name": "ContextPressureMonitor",
|
||||
"shortName": "Pression",
|
||||
"description": "Surveille la dégradation des performances de l'IA. Escalade lorsque la pression contextuelle menace la qualité.",
|
||||
"detail1": "Suit l'utilisation des tokens, la complexité, les taux d'erreur",
|
||||
"detail2": "Détecte les conditions de fonctionnement dégradées",
|
||||
"detail3": "Ajuste les exigences de vérification sous pression",
|
||||
"detail4": "Métriques objectives pour le suivi de la qualité",
|
||||
"promise": "Les métriques objectives peuvent détecter les tentatives de manipulation tôt."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"metacognitive": {
|
||||
"name": "MetacognitiveVerifier",
|
||||
"shortName": "Métacognitif",
|
||||
"description": "Exige que l'IA pause et vérifie les opérations complexes avant l'exécution. Vérification de sécurité structurelle.",
|
||||
"detail1": "L'IA vérifie elle-même l'alignement, la cohérence, la sécurité avant l'exécution",
|
||||
"detail2": "Portes structurelles de pause et vérification",
|
||||
"detail3": "Vérification sélective (pas constante)",
|
||||
"detail4": "Application architecturale des étapes de réflexion",
|
||||
"promise": "Les portes architecturales visent à appliquer les étapes de vérification."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"deliberation": {
|
||||
"name": "PluralisticDeliberationOrchestrator",
|
||||
"shortName": "Délibération",
|
||||
"description": "Facilite la délibération multi-parties prenantes pour les conflits de valeurs où aucune réponse \"correcte\" unique n'existe.",
|
||||
"detail1": "Coordination non hiérarchique pour les conflits de valeurs",
|
||||
"detail2": "Représentation des perspectives des parties prenantes",
|
||||
"detail3": "Construction de consensus pour les compromis éthiques",
|
||||
"detail4": "Adresse le pluralisme des valeurs dans la sécurité de l'IA",
|
||||
"promise": "Facilite la délibération à travers les perspectives des parties prenantes pour les conflits de valeurs."
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue