docs(bi): sanitize documentation for public consumption
Removed internal strategic information and reframed claims to align with framework rules (inst_016, inst_017, inst_018). Changes: - Removed frontmatter: media_rollout_notes, strategic_assessment - Removed maturity claims: 'novel approach', 'key innovation' - Removed unsupported claims: 'early evidence suggests', 'critical missing piece' Replaced with: - Research-appropriate language: 'research prototype', 'experimental system' - Empirical framing: 'Research Question: Can...' - Tentative conclusions: 'remains an empirical question' - Validation requirements emphasized throughout Document now appropriate for public consumption while maintaining technical accuracy and research integrity. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f9369967b1
commit
1f57c13d98
1 changed files with 4 additions and 26 deletions
|
|
@ -16,28 +16,6 @@ version_history:
|
|||
- "Current capability assessment"
|
||||
- "Short-term and long-term development roadmap"
|
||||
- "Research goals and limitations documented"
|
||||
|
||||
media_rollout_notes: |
|
||||
IMPORTANT: This is a research prototype demonstrating governance ROI visualization concepts.
|
||||
Before public announcement:
|
||||
- Validate cost calculation methodology with industry data
|
||||
- Add disclaimers about illustrative values
|
||||
- Test with pilot organizations for feedback
|
||||
- Consider peer review of approach
|
||||
|
||||
Timeline considerations:
|
||||
- Blog post planned for early November 2025
|
||||
- UI integration requires careful messaging about prototype status
|
||||
- Media rollout should emphasize research contribution, not commercial tool
|
||||
|
||||
strategic_assessment: |
|
||||
CRITICAL INSIGHT: ROI visualization may be the key differentiator for framework adoption.
|
||||
Organizations don't buy "governance frameworks" - they buy incident cost avoidance,
|
||||
compliance evidence, and team productivity metrics. This tool demonstrates how
|
||||
AI governance can be measured and justified to leadership.
|
||||
|
||||
However: Must maintain research integrity. Current cost factors are illustrative
|
||||
placeholders, not validated industry benchmarks.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Governance Business Intelligence Tools
|
||||
|
|
@ -51,13 +29,13 @@ strategic_assessment: |
|
|||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
This document describes a novel approach to **quantifying AI governance framework value** through business intelligence tools. The Tractatus Framework has implemented a research prototype that transforms technical governance metrics into executive-decision-relevant insights including cost avoidance, compliance evidence, and team productivity analysis.
|
||||
This document describes a **research prototype** for quantifying AI governance framework value through business intelligence tools. The Tractatus Framework has implemented an experimental system that transforms technical governance metrics into executive-decision-relevant insights including cost avoidance estimates, compliance evidence, and team productivity analysis.
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Innovation**: Automatic classification of AI-assisted work by activity type, risk level, and stakeholder impact enables real-time ROI calculation and organizational benchmarking.
|
||||
**Research Question**: Can automatic classification of AI-assisted work by activity type, risk level, and stakeholder impact enable meaningful ROI visualization and organizational benchmarking?
|
||||
|
||||
**Research Status**: Current implementation demonstrates feasibility. Cost factors are illustrative placeholders requiring validation. Methodology is sound; specific values need organizational customization.
|
||||
**Prototype Status**: Current implementation demonstrates technical feasibility. Cost factors are illustrative placeholders requiring validation against real organizational data. The classification methodology is heuristic-based; accuracy depends on organizational customization and empirical validation.
|
||||
|
||||
**Strategic Potential**: Early evidence suggests ROI visualization is the critical missing piece for governance framework adoption at scale.
|
||||
**Open Research Direction**: Whether ROI visualization addresses adoption barriers for governance frameworks remains an empirical question requiring pilot deployments and comparative studies.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue