diff --git a/public/index.html b/public/index.html index dc94d7e1..411d9e58 100644 --- a/public/index.html +++ b/public/index.html @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@
Six governance services coordinate, not operate in silos. When one detects an issue, others reinforce—creating resilient enforcement through mutual validation. @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@
Framework changes enhance without breaking. Audit logs remain interpretable, governance decisions stay valid—institutional memory preserved across evolution. @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@
Governance operates on intensity levels (NORMAL/ELEVATED/HIGH/CRITICAL), not yes/no switches. Nuanced response to risk—avoiding alert fatigue and mechanical enforcement. @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@
Framework evolves from real failures, not predetermined plans. Grows smarter through operational experience—adaptive resilience, not static rulebook. @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@
Governance woven into deployment architecture, not bolted on. Enforcement is structural, happening in the critical execution path before actions execute—bypasses require explicit flags and are logged. @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@
These principles guide every framework change—ensuring coherence, adaptability, and structural enforcement rather than compliance theatre.
diff --git a/public/leader.html b/public/leader.html index 6c326a83..be0e5997 100644 --- a/public/leader.html +++ b/public/leader.html @@ -121,11 +121,11 @@- Built on living systems principles from Christopher Alexander—governance that evolves with your organization + Built on living systems principles from Christopher Alexander—governance that evolves with your organization
Compliance theatre relies on documented policies, training programs, and post-execution reviews. AI can bypass controls, enforcement is voluntary, and audit trails show what should happen, not what did happen.
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@Six governance services coordinate in real-time. When one detects risk, others reinforce—resilient enforcement through mutual validation, not isolated checks.
-Business Value: Single service failure doesn't compromise governance. Redundant enforcement layer.
+data-i18n-html="alexander_leadership.principles.deep_interlock.business_value">Business Value: Single service failure doesn't compromise governance. Redundant enforcement layer.
Framework changes maintain audit continuity. Historical governance decisions remain interpretable—institutional memory preserved across evolution.
-Business Value: Regulatory audit trail remains valid. No "governance migration" breaking compliance records.
+data-i18n-html="alexander_leadership.principles.structure_preserving.business_value">Business Value: Regulatory audit trail remains valid. No "governance migration" breaking compliance records.
Governance operates on intensity levels (NORMAL/ELEVATED/HIGH/CRITICAL)—nuanced response to risk, not mechanical yes/no.
-Business Value: Avoids alert fatigue and over-enforcement. Matches governance intensity to actual risk level.
+data-i18n-html="alexander_leadership.principles.gradients.business_value">Business Value: Avoids alert fatigue and over-enforcement. Matches governance intensity to actual risk level.
Framework evolves from operational failures, not predetermined plans. Adaptive resilience—learns from real incidents.
-Business Value: Continuous improvement without governance migration. System gets smarter through use.
+data-i18n-html="alexander_leadership.principles.living_process.business_value">Business Value: Continuous improvement without governance migration. System gets smarter through use.
Governance woven into deployment architecture, integrated into the critical execution path. Not bolt-on compliance layer—enforcement is structural.
-Business Value: Bypasses require explicit flags and are logged. Enforcement happens before actions execute, not after.
+data-i18n-html="alexander_leadership.principles.not_separateness.business_value">Business Value: Bypasses require explicit flags and are logged. Enforcement happens before actions execute, not after.
Regulators increasingly distinguish between documented governance (policies, training, aspirational frameworks) and demonstrated enforcement (architectural constraints with audit trails proving real-time operation).
@@ -220,10 +220,10 @@ diff --git a/public/researcher.html b/public/researcher.html index 8f0f01f8..63b51240 100644 --- a/public/researcher.html +++ b/public/researcher.html @@ -141,60 +141,60 @@- Integrated: October 2025 | Status: Monitoring for Effectiveness + Integrated: October 2025 | Status: Monitoring for Effectiveness
+
The framework has integrated five architectural principles from Christopher Alexander's work on living systems, pattern languages, and wholeness (The Timeless Way of Building, A Pattern Language, The Nature of Order). These principles now guide all framework evolution:
+
Research Question: Can architectural principles from physical architecture domain (Alexander) be faithfully adapted to AI governance with measurable effectiveness? We are monitoring framework behavior through audit log analysis and seeking empirical validation.
-+
Collaborate with us: We welcome researchers interested in studying this application of architectural principles to AI governance. We can provide audit log access, framework code, and integration documentation for empirical study.